Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Software and Computers
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 18-03-2011, 06:03 PM
syousef
Registered User

syousef is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 107
Skycharts/Cartes 3 - Odd X-shapped pattern in PPMXL astro catalog

I've just downloaded, decompressed and run catgen on the PPMXL catalog data using catgen according to the instructions here:

http://www.ap-i.net/skychart/en/news/ppmxl_catalog

(Be warned if you're going to do the same downloading the catalog you need about 40GB of Internet download and 234 GB of disk (though you can bring this down to 156GB if you compress the right directories ahead of time. That's GB not MB. Don't even attempt this unless you've got a decent Internet plan and plenty of disk space to spare)

Got about 127kb worth of rejects out of catgen, but when you're talking 900 million stars that's nothing I was worried about and I don't think the data is corrupt. (PPMXL attempts to be complete to magnitude 20)

Within the first few minutes of playing I stumbled on the pattern in the attached images. I have no idea whether this pattern is a real phenomenon, or some strange artifact of the way the catalog has been created, or some sort of strangeness in the import. Playing around with DSS images, Skyview, and SIMBAD hasn't helped. There is a really bright object in the field as you can see, but that's about as much as I've been able to work out in the hour or so I've had to play. (I only dabble in Astronomy these days so I'm slow to do anything). Anyone else have any answers or know how I'd go about working this out?
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (stars1.jpg)
158.8 KB31 views
Click for full-size image (stars2.jpg)
135.1 KB23 views
Click for full-size image (stars3.jpg)
135.8 KB23 views
Click for full-size image (stars3-DSSImage.jpg)
82.4 KB28 views
Click for full-size image (stars3-SkyviewDSSImage.jpg)
122.9 KB18 views
Attached Files
File Type: zip strangestars.zip (3.1 KB, 11 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 19-03-2011, 09:00 PM
higginsdj's Avatar
higginsdj
A Lazy Astronomer

higginsdj is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 614
They are quite common in a lot of catalogues and are the result of spurious identification of stars along the spikes of bright stars.

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 19-03-2011, 10:04 PM
mithrandir's Avatar
mithrandir (Andrew)
Registered User

mithrandir is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Glenhaven
Posts: 4,161
There are some comments about there being spurious artefacts in the catalog.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19-03-2011, 11:13 PM
syousef
Registered User

syousef is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 107
Thanks for the replies. I wasn't sure anyone was going to answer.

Makes sense. I wonder how many of the 900 million stars are just artifacts. I guess I'll just have to use the catalog cautiously.

I'm guessing USNO-B1.0 (which I haven't managed to get my hands on yet) being one of the main source catalogs would be even worse, based on the comment "still some artefacts" in the link on the Skycharts page. I know it's much smaller but should I expect UCAC3 to be the same?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement