Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > Observational and Visual Astronomy
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 01-08-2005, 10:57 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
August Challenge Object - M55

Hi all.

We'd love you to take part in the August Observing and Imaging Challenge. Please post your reports, sketches and deep-space images of M55 in this thread. Discussions about the images can also be in this thread.

Please ensure the images obey the posting guidelines when you attach them.

While it would be nice if the report, sketch or image were taken in the month of August, it's not essential so feel free to post older reports and images if you're unable to take some new ones.

We look forward to seeing your contributions!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-08-2005, 02:42 PM
dhumpie
Planetary neb & glob nut

dhumpie is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 879
One of the nicer globs for small scopes, M55 is a rather loose globular much like Omega Centauri. From memory it is also a Class III like Omega. Using high powers (100x and above) the glob looks more like an open cluster in my C6 (6"f/5) than a globular. Numerous stars are also resolvable in my Orion 80ST at moderate magnifications. And I can distinctly detect granularity in my tripod mounted 15x70 binocs. As it is so "loose", the globular does not have a condensed core and therefore appears dimmer than other "more concentrated" globs. Only problem with this one is that it does not have very distinct signpost stars to guide you to it. see my sketch at:

http://www.geocities.com/dhumpie/dastro/m55.jpg

Darren
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-08-2005, 02:57 PM
atalas's Avatar
atalas
Registered User

atalas is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,148
Very well portrayed Darren,here's an image I took of It .

ED80 f/7.5 , 120sec

Louie
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (M55.jP.jpg)
104.5 KB100 views
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-08-2005, 03:00 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Very nice image Louie! That camera is starting to get a ncie workout.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-08-2005, 03:05 PM
atalas's Avatar
atalas
Registered User

atalas is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,148
Thanks Mike,I'll get better with It with time I'm sure.

Louie
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-08-2005, 03:44 PM
seeker372011's Avatar
seeker372011 (Narayan)
6EQUJ5

seeker372011 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,663
Nice pic Louie, you've got that ED80 smokin'
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-08-2005, 04:12 PM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
looks tight darren, I souldnt have any probs finding it

v/nice louie!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-08-2005, 04:17 PM
atalas's Avatar
atalas
Registered User

atalas is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,148
Thanks Narayan, the ED80 are proving to be a very capable scope for imaging and visual.
Now for $600.00 I don't think you can do better.
Louie
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-08-2005, 05:12 PM
dhumpie
Planetary neb & glob nut

dhumpie is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 879
Very nice Louie!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Keep up the good work...

Darren
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 23-08-2005, 09:31 PM
gaa_ian's Avatar
gaa_ian (Ian)
1300 THESKY

gaa_ian is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cairns Qld
Posts: 2,405
An easy find with a 10x finderscope, I was surprized by its dimness through the eyepiece & found it a bit hard to resolve at 180x with a 7mm widefield on my 10" dob.
Dropping back to 100x with a 12.5mm possol gave a better image & i can see where the comparrison to a compact open cluster comes from, an interesting object certainly.
Good to be able to get out before moonrise !
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 24-08-2005, 06:07 PM
dhumpie
Planetary neb & glob nut

dhumpie is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 879
Nice report!!!!!!!!!! Where are the rest of the people

Darren
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 24-08-2005, 08:59 PM
seeker372011's Avatar
seeker372011 (Narayan)
6EQUJ5

seeker372011 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,663
I imaged it with my ETX70 from Kulnura and seem to have lost the avi
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 24-08-2005, 09:47 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
Saw it about an hour ago (8.15 24th aug) using the binos & 6" refractor. Not a bad view in the 15X70 binos. Unfortunately their screaming out to be collimated. No stars resolved, just a fuzzy blob. Much better views using the refractor @ 50X A lot of stars resolved.

Update: Saw it again this time using the 12.5" reflector...WOW! Resolved really well, nice bright stars. I must say I didn't expect to by stunned by the sight of this open cluster, but I was! Very nice!

Last edited by asimov; 31-08-2005 at 02:15 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 24-08-2005, 10:02 PM
atalas's Avatar
atalas
Registered User

atalas is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,148
Interesting reports guy's on the Glob M55,I too have always found my self dropping back to medium power with a lot of the Globs. Tend to enjoy them better that way I guess, even in large aperture instruments. John E, I don't think that 70mm bino's could resolve It even If collimated well anyway mate. You would need a least 100mm I would think,then again I could be wrong . Do I smell a challenge to resolve in the smallest aperture coming !

Louie
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 24-08-2005, 10:09 PM
atalas's Avatar
atalas
Registered User

atalas is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,148
Narayan , there's a rumour going around that your loosing your avi's !

I wouldn't have a bar of It ! yes I know this isn't a joke thread !

Louie
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 24-08-2005, 10:29 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
Hi Atalas. Your post got me off my behind! Just made a quick aperture mask of 70mm for the refractor..."to resolve or not to resolve" THAT is the question..
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 24-08-2005, 10:36 PM
atalas's Avatar
atalas
Registered User

atalas is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,148
Good one John ! let us know how you go and to what aperture you had to use to resolve M55 .


ps. I have that affect on people

Louie
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 24-08-2005, 11:01 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
I'm back with my results. Stars resolved at 70mm is 1! only JUST too. (with 10 mins dark adaption)

Easily resolvable at 150mm. At 120mm easily resolvable with only a couple of mins dark adaption. Good call Atalas! Judging by all that, I'd guess a 4" aperture minimum to resolve it. Now I need a variable aperture mask rather than making a dozen of them at different sizes.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 25-08-2005, 09:52 PM
atalas's Avatar
atalas
Registered User

atalas is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,148
Nice work John, at what mag are your skies ?

Louie
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 25-08-2005, 10:07 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
Between 5.5-6 Louie.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement