Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Astrophotography and Imaging Equipment and Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 08-08-2016, 01:35 PM
Robbos30's Avatar
Robbos30 (Peter)
Registered User

Robbos30 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: North Brisbane .Bald Hills.
Posts: 47
Secondary mirror size for 30 telescope.(Photography).

Hi, Can anyone help me?
I was talking to a few chaps at Astrofest on the weekend and was pointed to ice in space.
I wanted to know what size secondary mirror I would theroricialy need to turn my f (4.818) Dob into a photographically scope? For visual it has a 4.5 inch secondary currently.
I've been looking at an equatorial platform from Tom O (USA) as well and wondering if the f ratio 4.818 is going to be a major disadvantage? The EQ has a provision for a plug in guider eg ST4.
Just playing with the figures at present.
Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-08-2016, 02:19 PM
clive milne
Registered User

clive milne is offline
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Freo WA
Posts: 1,443
Depends how big the chip is and how much vignetting you are prepared to accept... A 5" secondary would be fine for a small chip, but you would need a 6" if you intend to cover something like a 16003
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-08-2016, 04:15 PM
billdan's Avatar
billdan (Bill)
Registered User

billdan is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Narangba, SE QLD
Posts: 1,551
A more complicated alternative if you wanted to keep your secondary, use a low profile focuser that gets the CCD chip closer to the mirror.
Downside is you will have to extend your truss rods by the same distance that you gained to achieve focus.

Cheers
Bill
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-08-2016, 04:52 PM
Mighty_oz (Marcus)
Registered User

Mighty_oz is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Atm somewhere in Perth
Posts: 575
Have a chat with Peter Read at SDM he will have some ideas The EQ from equatorial platforms ? They look nice.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-08-2016, 07:32 PM
AstroJunk's Avatar
AstroJunk (Jonathan)
Shadow Chaser

AstroJunk is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Moonee Beach
Posts: 1,922
Oddly enough I did discuss this with Peter and he pointed me here: http://www.televue.com/engine/TV3b_p...d=61&Tab=_phot

In essence, the type 2 Paracorr can be used for both Visual and imaging without the need to change your pole length! I have the type 1 sadly but am looking to change it at some point.

It's better explained with the 3" version: http://www.televue.com/engine/TV3b_p...=61&Tab=_phot3
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-08-2016, 08:38 PM
Robbos30's Avatar
Robbos30 (Peter)
Registered User

Robbos30 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: North Brisbane .Bald Hills.
Posts: 47
Robbos30

Thanks everyone , I really appreciate your feedback. Exciting prospect.very deep learning curve.
Peter.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-08-2016, 04:26 PM
troypiggo's Avatar
troypiggo (Troy)
Bust Duster

troypiggo is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 4,846
Not sure if you're already aware, but check out some of Alex Cherney's deep sky images using his 22" SDM. Most shots are stacks of just 15 second subs!

http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...ad.php?t=74060
http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...ad.php?t=71913
http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...archid=3820206
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-08-2016, 09:08 AM
Robbos30's Avatar
Robbos30 (Peter)
Registered User

Robbos30 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: North Brisbane .Bald Hills.
Posts: 47
I'm shocked with the results! That's amazing! I'm hooked!
Thanks so much guys!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement