Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 14-01-2011, 02:57 AM
mswhin63's Avatar
mswhin63 (Malcolm)
Registered User

mswhin63 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Para Hills, South Australia
Posts: 3,620
Orion Widefield

Hi,

Considering I need to go wide-field for a while, I picked up a low cost 75-300mm canon lens and for what its worth is surprising good. The only thing I believe needs to be looked at is fringing which is quite bad, although there was a UV blocking filter on the front of the lens it has some sort of fault that caused ghosting.

This is one image I took on the night, the fringe has been dampened a bit using a script called Defringe for GIMP.
It couldn't get rid of the star blowout but it did remove an awful lot of the dark blue fringe.

Any further advice would be good eg: filters for the lens etc.

Canon 450D 300mm, 40 x 15 seconds @ 800ISO
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Orion_cut.jpg)
123.3 KB109 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 14-01-2011, 09:43 PM
rcheshire's Avatar
rcheshire (Rowland)
Registered User

rcheshire is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Geelong
Posts: 2,617
Hi Malcolm. I would remove the filter and stop down 2 stops from your widest aperture and increase the exposure time - say 20 or 30 seconds. This should improve things. Slightly longer exposure though. And be very critical with focus.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 15-01-2011, 03:09 AM
mswhin63's Avatar
mswhin63 (Malcolm)
Registered User

mswhin63 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Para Hills, South Australia
Posts: 3,620
Thanks for the advice, will try it hopefully tmw
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 15-01-2011, 01:35 PM
Visionoz's Avatar
Visionoz (Bill)
Registered User

Visionoz is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 717
Malcolm perhaps the lens has too much CA it being a "cheapie" zoom and as suggested stopping down might "reduce" it

HTH
Cheers
Bill
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 15-01-2011, 02:15 PM
bojan's Avatar
bojan
amateur

bojan is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mt Waverley, VIC
Posts: 6,943
Perhaps even better way might be to place external aperture.
This worked surprisingly well with my Canon 200mm and 300mm FD lenses - f5.6 removed the bloating and CA completely, while internal stop just reduced the bloating somewhat but the CA remained.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 15-01-2011, 03:26 PM
mswhin63's Avatar
mswhin63 (Malcolm)
Registered User

mswhin63 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Para Hills, South Australia
Posts: 3,620
I think i will try all of the suggestion many thanks, but I have also been considering RGB imaging, maybe this is a good place to start.

I split the RGB on the original image and there is definately CA on the blue, it is way out of focus on blue. I think green is bit as well.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 15-01-2011, 05:30 PM
bojan's Avatar
bojan
amateur

bojan is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mt Waverley, VIC
Posts: 6,943
If you want to get rid of lateral CA, Gimp has appropriate plugin. This doesn't help on axial CA (out of focus for different colours.. maybe you should try focus magic on R, G & B frames?)
I was using it on the final (8-bit) images.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 15-01-2011, 05:59 PM
rcheshire's Avatar
rcheshire (Rowland)
Registered User

rcheshire is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Geelong
Posts: 2,617
Quote:
Perhaps even better way might be to place external aperture
That's an interesting point. Do you mean placing a card with a smaller hole over the front of the lens?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 15-01-2011, 06:23 PM
luigi
Registered User

luigi is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 438
The 75-300 is unusable from 200 to 300mm, I wouldn't put any time in trying to get something from that lens.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 15-01-2011, 06:27 PM
bojan's Avatar
bojan
amateur

bojan is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mt Waverley, VIC
Posts: 6,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by rcheshire View Post
That's an interesting point. Do you mean placing a card with a smaller hole over the front of the lens?
Yes.
Have a look here, post #6 specifically:http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...ht=canon+200mm

I have similar results with Pentax and Tamron lenses (above 200mm).
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 15-01-2011, 07:01 PM
mswhin63's Avatar
mswhin63 (Malcolm)
Registered User

mswhin63 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Para Hills, South Australia
Posts: 3,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by bojan View Post
Yes.
Have a look here, post #6 specifically:http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...ht=canon+200mm

I have similar results with Pentax and Tamron lenses (above 200mm).
That is a great example and seem to duplicate my issues.

Quote:
Originally Posted by luigi View Post
The 75-300 is unusable from 200 to 300mm, I wouldn't put any time in trying to get something from that lens.
Some people told me I wouldn't get much from a DOB but I managed to find a way, maybe you are right but I love to experiment and I believe there maybe a way. RGB would most probably be the ultimate. I have another test that I want to try without RGB filters am going to try, I hope it will provide the same effect as photgraphing RGB. I tried to buy some RGB today but nothing in stock state wide at least.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bojan View Post
If you want to get rid of lateral CA, Gimp has appropriate plugin. This doesn't help on axial CA (out of focus for different colours.. maybe you should try focus magic on R, G & B frames?)
I was using it on the final (8-bit) images.
Haven't seen focus magic will search for it, I have a couple of plugins already 2 of them are CA and the Orion has been dealt with, the initial images were really bad.

All in all I dont have the money to buy a $1000.00 lens otherwise I would buy a widefield triplet carbon fibre scope an do it that way. At least when I get my surgery done I can handle a lense on a camera and can get my wife and/or kids to carry the tripod out an set it up when needed, I already have spots marked on the pavement to place the legs of the tripod. 6 to 9 month later when I finally recover I may use my DOB again.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 15-01-2011, 11:20 PM
rcheshire's Avatar
rcheshire (Rowland)
Registered User

rcheshire is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Geelong
Posts: 2,617
Quote:
Have a look here, post #6 specifically:http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...ht=canon+200mm
That's amazing - I must try it out on an EF-S lens.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 16-01-2011, 12:05 AM
mswhin63's Avatar
mswhin63 (Malcolm)
Registered User

mswhin63 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Para Hills, South Australia
Posts: 3,620
FYI, I have done a very quick test as I am quite busy tonight, took a shot with precise focus and as usual red and blue are out of focus while green is sharp as.

I then miss focused by a smidgen and behold blue and red was in focus and green was out of focus. Apart from looking a bit green the star looked very symmetrical and there was no fringing either. This hold to the ability to use RGB and focus refocus for each colour.

Couldn't buy any RGB filters today though. I am though considering filtering the monitor to the individual colours and refocus not sure if it will work but could be a very low cost method.

I want to look at consideration of fitting a filter-wheel between the Canon and lense but that would be quite a chore.

Next step will be increase F/STOP and test that but for another night.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 16-01-2011, 11:39 AM
bojan's Avatar
bojan
amateur

bojan is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mt Waverley, VIC
Posts: 6,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by mswhin63 View Post
FYI, I have done a very quick test as I am quite busy tonight, took a shot with precise focus and as usual red and blue are out of focus while green is sharp as.
Yes, that is axial CA.. stopping down the aperture will most likely help here.

And, you don't really need filters if you want to try with RGB (because the camera sensor already have them anyway): You only need to take 3 shots, focussed for R, G, B.
Then, you can separate channels (using IRIS software) and recombine the focussed frames only, discarding the rest.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 16-01-2011, 02:42 PM
mswhin63's Avatar
mswhin63 (Malcolm)
Registered User

mswhin63 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Para Hills, South Australia
Posts: 3,620
Hi Bojan,

I was considering the alternative of purchasing cheap RGB filter to cover the monitor and re-focus on each. This would save on buying filters that cost at least $99.00 each.

Without the filters it is only an approximation.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 16-01-2011, 07:02 PM
bojan's Avatar
bojan
amateur

bojan is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mt Waverley, VIC
Posts: 6,943
Fair enough, sounds reasonable .
Let us know the outcome

Quote:
Originally Posted by mswhin63 View Post
Hi Bojan,

I was considering the alternative of purchasing cheap RGB filter to cover the monitor and re-focus on each. This would save on buying filters that cost at least $99.00 each.

Without the filters it is only an approximation.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 01:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement