Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 04-10-2009, 09:45 PM
mswhin63's Avatar
mswhin63 (Malcolm)
Registered User

mswhin63 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Para Hills, South Australia
Posts: 3,622
My very first image

Hi all,

Feel a bit nervous, took an AVI from my 12" collapsable DOB using a webcam, so I know it is not perfect.

Actually the viewing condition last night were not as good as the night before so the image was not as good as it can get.

I would love to show the AVI but all 5 AVI's are at least 2GB in size from only 1 minute of footage each. ecen the last AVI 800 x 600 res was 4G only because I forgot to switch off the capture.

I used Advance Video Editor to take away a frame while playing the AVI. Neat program although installs a bit weird.

Before the verdict, a few things I am waiting on;
IR Filter
Focal reducer

IR Filter mainly for Jupiter as I got some footage of that as well but is completely blown out

The webcam manual control are a bit poor as I tried to manually adjust the exposure down but was not good enough, but the auto exposure it quite poor which is the main reason for not showing moon edge which has the best definition. I have some edge of moon images I am going to fiddle with as well.

First image is the original the second image has been touch up wth GIMP2 all done in a couple of minutes.

http://www.waelect.com.au/images/moon_2%20Frame598.bmp

http://www.waelect.com.au/images/moo...Frame598_1.bmp

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-10-2009, 10:05 PM
picklesrules (Nicholas)
Registered User

picklesrules is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Jane Brook, Australia
Posts: 306
nice
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-10-2009, 10:17 PM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,798
Malcolm, for a very first attempt you have done pretty well, and with time and experience I'm sure it can only get better from here on in, well done.

Leon
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-10-2009, 01:07 AM
mswhin63's Avatar
mswhin63 (Malcolm)
Registered User

mswhin63 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Para Hills, South Australia
Posts: 3,622
Just another image major cut down to fit in with attachement size. Find that moon image best view not when the moon if full will wait now for the next Lunatiks night.

Great experiment though, al the image ar converted to greyscale as I am not experienced enough with colour.

The AVI though were in colour found the auto white balance was changing the colour too much, The webcam is an experiement not modified as yet if it can.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (moon_5 Frame2311_1.jpg)
30.0 KB79 views
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-10-2009, 07:37 PM
Lumen Miner's Avatar
Lumen Miner (Mitchell)
Registered User

Lumen Miner is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Beecroft, Sydney
Posts: 825
Nice shots!!
Did you sharpen the images at all?
I just ran a shot of yours, through gimp and there is more detail to pull out on those...

Keep them coming, they are great!!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-10-2009, 08:46 PM
spearo's Avatar
spearo (Frank)
accepts all donations

spearo is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Braidwood (outskirts)
Posts: 2,281
well done
welcome to the world of imaging!
frank
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-10-2009, 09:25 PM
mswhin63's Avatar
mswhin63 (Malcolm)
Registered User

mswhin63 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Para Hills, South Australia
Posts: 3,622
Thanks for the comments. The webcam is a beauty really totally unmodified and managed to picked a few low mag star as well. Only got minimal specs on the camera was plannig about a year ago to start selling to our deaf client for sign language comms. The camera is still in its case and was easy to place a mogg adaptor to.

The images on this site are only altered exposure level.

I did get a very slight sharpening but not much headroom.

My filters and focal reducer arrived this morning so the scope is outside getting cooled down now ready for another go. Beautiful sky but as I have found out looks can be deceiving.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-10-2009, 09:46 PM
DavidU's Avatar
DavidU (Dave)
Like to learn

DavidU is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: melbourne
Posts: 4,835
Mal, get out there and post some more images ! Good on ya
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-10-2009, 02:44 AM
mswhin63's Avatar
mswhin63 (Malcolm)
Registered User

mswhin63 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Para Hills, South Australia
Posts: 3,622
Seeing condition were terrible, clear but high wind possibly causing really bad wobble.

Also still having problems with exposure level even with 3 filters on the camera.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-10-2009, 03:43 PM
Robbie
JAFO

Robbie is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Perth West Aussie
Posts: 183
Nice shots welcome to the "Imaging is a damn sight harder than it looks!!!" club
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-10-2009, 04:59 PM
mswhin63's Avatar
mswhin63 (Malcolm)
Registered User

mswhin63 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Para Hills, South Australia
Posts: 3,622
Yeah, also I think I didn't configure my focal reducer properly and had to collapse my DOB nearly 6" to get something.

Also need a bigger table too. Things strarted to fall on the ground. Maybe another DOH moment!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-10-2009, 06:52 PM
Robbie
JAFO

Robbie is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Perth West Aussie
Posts: 183
OH AND DONT FORGET !!! a switch to turn off the wind, another to turn off the moon, a left handed screwdriver, a can of striped paint and some ordinary household bleach.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-10-2009, 09:33 PM
Inmykombi's Avatar
Inmykombi (Geoff)
They aint just doubles :o

Inmykombi is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Gosford NSW Australia
Posts: 2,339
Some nice clear details there Malcolm.

Keep going with this as you have done very well for your first attempt.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 16-10-2009, 10:47 PM
mswhin63's Avatar
mswhin63 (Malcolm)
Registered User

mswhin63 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Para Hills, South Australia
Posts: 3,622
Just for the hell of it I started to experiment on a Mosaic suggest by Roger. As the camera was auto adjusting the contrast, brightness and white-balance it made it surprisingly difficult to put the image together.

Now that I have managed to learn more on the camera set-up I hope to have another go later.

The original image is 36M so it has been reduced significantly. After doing 4 resonable images when the fifth one was done had significant difficultly matching. This could be because the top pass was a different AVI. I expect the auto setting changed significantly as well.

I realise the image is way high in contrast hope to fix that on the next run.

http://d.yimg.com/kq/groups/3907819/...ic_reduced.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 17-10-2009, 07:23 AM
spearo's Avatar
spearo (Frank)
accepts all donations

spearo is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Braidwood (outskirts)
Posts: 2,281
the mosaic looks very cool
like the stuff NASA used to produce
cool
frank
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 17-10-2009, 07:54 AM
stephenb's Avatar
stephenb (Stephen)
Registered User

stephenb is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: all over the shop...
Posts: 2,098
Hi Malcolm, nothing wrong with those as a first attempt. Very nice indeed. I would be pleased with them if they were mine

Have you tried Registax to process your avi file?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 17-10-2009, 10:29 AM
mswhin63's Avatar
mswhin63 (Malcolm)
Registered User

mswhin63 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Para Hills, South Australia
Posts: 3,622
Thanks for the input, I have registax but have not figured out how to use registax on this type if AVI only Jupiter as I use other programs to modify Jupiter to get my results. The scope does not track so the moon drifts along the view, I then move the scope to cover the next area.

I use Advanced Video Editing to take snapshots of the particular area. Registax stacks multiple images to create less noise problems but I can't get multiple images of the same area.

I don't know if Registax clean up a single BMP but may give it a go. I also downloaded a program called CADET, free program for deconvolution.

Anyway as it is my very first attempt I will concentrate a lot on taking more comprehensive AVI's on the next moon run (Lunatiks) in Perth towards the end of this month, less light pollution than my home.

I also need to be careful as I don't have a load of money. If I catch the Astrophotography bug I won't have enough money to satisfy the feeling.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 17-10-2009, 11:35 AM
p3nn (James)
Registered User

p3nn is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 50
Hi Malcom

Registax can be set to track the object assuming it's within all the frames you wish to stack. In my Jupiter avi Jupiter started in the middle but drifted to one side. I used the align box just big enough to surround Jupiter in a frame I thought was a better one and registax followed it right to the edge. You don't need to include the moon in the allign box as it's just a frame of reference to my understanding used to align portions of the image to stack
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 18-10-2009, 12:20 AM
mswhin63's Avatar
mswhin63 (Malcolm)
Registered User

mswhin63 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Para Hills, South Australia
Posts: 3,622
Thanks for the tip, I was able to use Registax easily for Jupiter, I was glad to find a single image automatically went the wavelet stage. Did some playing around managed to get a sharper image quite nice but the image was majorly blown out from previous attempts. It also shown up the imperfection on the mosaic too. I will either attempt to spend some time on the same images again or wait till Lunatick to take another AVI of the moon and start over again.

I am amazed how much memory on the hard drive that was used, I started to hit the red-line. Managed to zip some files to save space.

May look at storing image and stuff on USB Stick.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 18-10-2009, 02:27 PM
p3nn (James)
Registered User

p3nn is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 50
Hi Malcom

I had probs getting more than 1 frame to stack when I first tried registax as well. I think that was cuz I chose a poor reference frame to align on, i.e. just used the first frame. At the bottom before you set the align point you can move thru the frames to chose what you think is the best, then set the align point on that frame. It will be the 100% as compared with other frames. Also if too few frames are making it into the stack, try relaxing the min tolerance a little and a few more may make it in. I've reduced to 70% for some short vids which gave me better results. Something else to consider when shooting untracked vids is to maybe up the fps a lil. More frames to stack may help reduce the noise in the final pic. Can't hurt to try and see what it does for your pics
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement