Hi Rob,
Here's an extract from what appears to be a
report on apochromats:
Quote:
Ohara is at present a major supplier of ED glasses (although other firms also melt them). They produce three varieties, called "S-FPL 51," "S-FPL 52," and "S-FPL 53." S-FPL51 is the least abnormal and delicate, while S-FPL53 (the latest to be marketed) is softer and can be broken rather easily, though it is less fragile than fluorite. Its optical properties, however, come closest to fluorite of any true glass.
|
I'm certainly no expert on this stuff, but from what I've read when one is thinking "apo", one also has to take into consideration the mating element as that is what will make the difference.
Here is an article by Roland Christen (owner/founder of Astro-Physics telescopes) on colour correction. An extract states:
Quote:
YES, there is a difference between various ED and Fluorite scopes, but it is
not really the ED or Fluorite that governs the amount of correction, but the
mating element. Normally, even the worst ED design will have 4 times better
color correction than a normal achromat, but it could easily be 20 times
better simply by choosing a different mating element.
|
Hope this gets you started (and it's ok to qoute these).
Cheers,
Andrew.