Quote:
Originally Posted by Zuts
Hi,
Looks like you are on a winner with the new scope. A 5 inch refractor is a heap of glass for the money you paid. Can I ask what it is like regards field curvature for visual at low focal lengths?
Paul
|
Visually its fine, but it did do one thing in that I realised that I need better eyepieces. Using a friends Vixen LVWs (22 and 13mm) they were what was needed to do justice to my scope. The crappy Meade ones did not cut it as they relied on the f10 of my SCT to be OK but the f7.45 of the scope needs better eyepieces. At low power the scope appears flat across the eyepiece.
But I really must stress that I'm talking about the scope that I have and that there may be variability in their manufacture in China that those that are purchasing directly are taking a chance (in my opinion). I purchased mine from Steve Massey and I trusted his detailed description before purchase in the understanding that if it was not an APO and as described it would go back. Thats what I paid for and I was glad to trust him and his opinions. I sincerely trust that others that take a chance that it pays off - but thats life I guess.
Regards, Allan
PS I'm glad to answer any questions about the scope and its use. I attach a shot taken with a 350D of 4x5min with three darks at ISO800 of M20. Im more pleased with this shot that any other Ive taken. The only manipulation was a stretch in PS. Note that down sizing it really adds artifacts but I was really pleased with the extent of the faint blue nebulosity around M20 that is very hard to get except with a scope that does have good light coatings and baffles. No focal reducer or flattener used.