Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Eyepieces, Barlows and Filters
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 20-02-2007, 01:41 PM
bytor666
Cygnus X-1

bytor666 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 366
27mm vs. 35mm Panoptic

I need to know which one you would prefer in an 8" f/6 reflector
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 20-02-2007, 03:50 PM
Dave47tuc's Avatar
Dave47tuc (David)
IIS member 65

Dave47tuc is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Mornington peninsula. Victoria.
Posts: 1,658
I use a 35 Pano in my 10" and love it.
Can not got wrong with either
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 20-02-2007, 05:06 PM
Starkler's Avatar
Starkler (Geoff)
4000 post club member

Starkler is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
If your goal is max field then the 35 pano will give it with a 5.8mm exit pupil, which is good from a dark sky and not so good where there is light polution.

Personally I would choose a 30mm Pentax XW for that scope.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 20-02-2007, 05:30 PM
astroboy's Avatar
astroboy
Registered User

astroboy is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lake Bathurst NSW
Posts: 696
Hi
I have both and find the 35 mm has less barrel distortion which is only noticable when moving the scope , but it is a lot heavier , both very nice though.

Zane
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 21-02-2007, 12:15 AM
janoskiss's Avatar
janoskiss (Steve H)
Registered User

janoskiss is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sale, VIC
Posts: 6,033
Eye placement is more critical with the 35mm IME. On the few occasions I tried it I found it awkward to use compared with the 27mm. (But I did own a 27mm Pano though so I was more used to that.) A couple of Televue eyeguard extender should help with that though.

If finances allow, I second Geoff's recommendation of 30mm XW. Brilliant. Has Panoptics for breakfast.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 24-02-2007, 12:31 AM
AstroJunk's Avatar
AstroJunk (Jonathan)
Shadow Chaser

AstroJunk is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Moonee Beach
Posts: 1,909
At such a low power the answer has to be the 35 - I assume you're looking for maximum fov for open clusters with this one?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 27-02-2007, 07:08 AM
bytor666
Cygnus X-1

bytor666 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 366
Quote:
If finances allow, I second Geoff's recommendation of 30mm XW. Brilliant. Has Panoptics for breakfast.
From the Pentax XW's I've tried, (14mm XW, 10mm XW & 7mm XW), I would jump all over a 30mm XW if I knew how it performed and I had the $$$. I hated the curvature in the 14mm XW, but loved the 7 & 10mm. What is the 30mm XW Like???
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 27-02-2007, 07:43 AM
Ambermile's Avatar
Ambermile
I make stuff...

Ambermile is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Norfolk, UK
Posts: 229
I'd say the 27mm actually - more contrast will be available as you will not be stretching the optics so far. To go the extra mile though... 31mm T5

Arthur
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 27-02-2007, 08:47 AM
skies2clear
Registered User

skies2clear is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 238
Quote:
Originally Posted by bytor666 View Post
From the Pentax XW's I've tried, (14mm XW, 10mm XW & 7mm XW), I would jump all over a 30mm XW if I knew how it performed and I had the $$$. I hated the curvature in the 14mm XW, but loved the 7 & 10mm. What is the 30mm XW Like???
Agree with others here about the 30mm XW. It's great. Most comfortable to use of any 30mm or thereabouts. Whole field presents itself beautifully.

Clear skies
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 27-02-2007, 01:04 PM
Starkler's Avatar
Starkler (Geoff)
4000 post club member

Starkler is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
Quote:
Originally Posted by bytor666 View Post
I hated the curvature in the 14mm XW, but loved the 7 & 10mm. What is the 30mm XW Like???
Certain eyepieces like the panoptics and the 12mm nagler t4 show alot of spikes and coma-like astigmatism to my eyes when viewing stars.
I see next to none of this in the 30mm xw so the view looks much 'cleaner' to me.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 27-02-2007, 01:28 PM
janoskiss's Avatar
janoskiss (Steve H)
Registered User

janoskiss is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sale, VIC
Posts: 6,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by bytor666 View Post
From the Pentax XW's I've tried, (14mm XW, 10mm XW & 7mm XW), I would jump all over a 30mm XW if I knew how it performed and I had the $$$. I hated the curvature in the 14mm XW, but loved the 7 & 10mm. What is the 30mm XW Like???
None of the FC of the 14mm (I don't like that either). Like Geoff said astigmatic stars off-axis in 27mm Pano are pinpoints in 30mm XW. The 30mm XW is very much like the 10mm in every respect except magnification of course.

But should note that the astigmatism in the Pano is very mild compared with cheaper widefields, e.g. 30mm superview or 1rpd & clones.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:23 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement