Most Read Articles
Moon Phase
CURRENT MOON Waxing Crescent
The Sun Now
Time Zones
12:28 am
10:28 pm
2:28 am
New York*
10:28 am
4:28 pm
2:28 pm

Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat

Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 21-04-2018, 02:04 PM
wavelandscott's Avatar
wavelandscott (Scott)
Plays well with others!

wavelandscott is offline
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ridgefield CT USA
Posts: 3,216
This is my Wife’s Uncle Jimmy....

I copied from Wikipedia...

How thrust is hypothesized to be produced by the Woodward effect. The C represents a capacitor element, L represents an inductor element.
The Woodward effect, also referred to as a Mach effect, is part of a hypothesis proposed by James F. Woodward in 1990.[1] The hypothesis states that transient mass fluctuations arise in any object that absorbs internal energy while undergoing a proper acceleration. Harnessing this effect could generate a reactionless thrust, which Woodward and others claim to measure in various experiments.[2][3]

Hypothetically, the Woodward effect would allow for field propulsion spacecraft engines that would not have to expel matter. Such a proposed engine, is sometimes called a Mach effect thruster (MET) or a Mach Effect Gravitational Assist (MEGA) drive.[4][5] So far, experimental results have not strongly supported this hypothesis,[6] but experimental research on this effect, and its potential applications, continues.[7] The anomalous thrust detected in some RF resonant cavity thruster (EmDrive/Cannae drive) experiments may be explained by the same type of Mach effect proposed by Woodward.[8][9][10]

The Space Studies Institute was selected as part of NASA's Innovative Advanced Concepts program as a Phase I proposal in April 2017 for Mach Effect research.[11][12][13][14] The year after, NASA awarded a NIAC Phase II grant to the SSI to further develop these propellantless thrusters.[15][16]
Reply With Quote
Old 21-04-2018, 03:53 PM
dpastern (Dave Pastern)
PI cult member

dpastern is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,797
Originally Posted by xelasnave View Post
Dave GR has been tested every which way such that from what I can grasp it really cant take us further.

I really think GR has become a business ... there is now no prediction that has not been tested as far as I know...its been done to death and it seems that the great minds tired up in GR could be put to better use.

The environment does not exist where something new can drop out of the research.

I think there is a better case for funding scientists to just do "what pops into your head" if we seek new stuff.

However on the bright side GR does keep a lot of great minds active I expect.

It is hard to think of something new these days.

Once I could come up with what would be judged as a rat bag idea that could never happen whereas now you get an idea search on utube and there it is with 30 people doing what you thought about.

I thought one could inflate a black plastic bag with air let it heat up in the Sun and you would have a solar hot air I go on utube and find 30 people with solar hot air ballons.

I designed a cat to take the world sail record which was pretty novel and a couple of weeks ago find it out there such that it matched my plans...and it did take the record...but funny I cant find it again ...which I must there was one aspect not in the one I saw which probably would give a little more speed.

So its cloudy here as you can guess.

OH well, I personally find the research around black hole mergers interesting. :-)
Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2018, 02:07 PM
Kal's Avatar
Kal (Andrew)
1" v

Kal is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,776
Some new updates
Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2018, 02:33 PM
dpastern (Dave Pastern)
PI cult member

dpastern is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,797
Originally Posted by Kal View Post
Now why doesn't that surprise I said, warp drive is a far better tech to be pursuing.
Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2018, 02:44 PM
deanm (Dean)
Registered User

deanm is offline
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 798
EM? It's all a furphy:
Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2018, 04:27 PM
dpastern (Dave Pastern)
PI cult member

dpastern is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,797
Originally Posted by deanm View Post
never heard the term "furphy" before, but yes, I agree.
Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SkyWatcher WiFi Adaptor
Atik Horizon
OzScopes Authorised Dealer
Interest Free Finance
FLI Cameras and Imaging Accessories
SkyWatcher 2018 Catalogue
Lunatico Astronomical
NexDome Observatories
Astronomy and Electronics Centre