Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 18-11-2010, 04:33 PM
mswhin63's Avatar
mswhin63 (Malcolm)
Registered User

mswhin63 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Para Hills, South Australia
Posts: 3,620
M42 My Very second narrow field attempt.

Hi Everyone,


I didn't expect to even consider narrowfield deep space but here it is. There is a lot I have to explain so I will list it;
  1. Dobsonian 12" 1500mm - Lots of Coma distortion and as I didn't expect to deep sky narrow-field haven't bought a Coma corrector.
  2. Happy Snaps - 45 x 10 second snaps ISO 1600 20 x darks and 20 x library Offsets. Any lower ISO or longer shots, my mount wouldn't have handled it. I am happy with noise levels though.
  3. EQ platform, No guiding at all, each snap was hopeful tracking. Mount is out of balance a bit, was design as a prototype needs more refinement for better tracking.
  4. 65 Shots taken - 35 used in final stack better than 50%
  5. Unmodded Rebel XSi / 450D
  6. Used APT to take snaps as well.
  7. Electric focuser came today so had to manual focus last night.
  8. Colours - don't go there, wouldn't have a clue
  9. DSS stack nothing else.
Apart from that overall I am happy with my 2nd attempt, although my first attempt was a single shot shot using the camera shutter, wobbled everywhere.

I am not really after any serious comments on composition but are welcome, I don't think I could handle it at the moment. I expect before I serious commit to low cost DS AP I will get a guide/widefield scope attached to the DOB.

Enjoy
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Orion_2010_11_17_Reduced_50PC.jpg)
142.9 KB231 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 18-11-2010, 11:51 PM
Sylvain (Jon)
Stars Chaser

Sylvain is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 294
Wow nice one Malcom!
I like it!
It must have been a bit of an exercice, but I reckon you nailed it!

Well done mate!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 19-11-2010, 12:22 PM
niko's Avatar
niko
Registered User

niko is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 1,053
what an excellent image - lots of nebulosity detail and the trapezium looks terrific

well done Malcolm
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19-11-2010, 10:00 PM
mswhin63's Avatar
mswhin63 (Malcolm)
Registered User

mswhin63 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Para Hills, South Australia
Posts: 3,620
Thanks for the positive comments, I really couldn't let this one go, I have reprocessed it not sure if I have done anything wrong but I wanted to contrast more the 4 star in the centre and more for the darker dust lanes. There is not much exposure level and with a bright moon behind I wouldn't have been able to increase the exposure time anyway.

I have made some adjustment the most prominant is the 4 star in the middle of the original image are distint more now and not so much blown out. I also reduced the number of image stacked from 45 to 17 as I manually went through each image and discarded any stars that looked a bit out of wack so the image is a bit noisier

I don't have Photoshop only GIMP, I need to spend more money on hardware more than software so if there are any extra information on making GIMP usable would appreciate it.

Enjoy.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Orion_2010_11_17_Second Attempt Reduced_50PC.jpg)
82.9 KB77 views
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 20-11-2010, 07:52 AM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,062
That's a good shot Malcolm. Very nice colors in there and the framing is spot on IMHO. Good work.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 20-11-2010, 10:08 AM
rcheshire's Avatar
rcheshire (Rowland)
Registered User

rcheshire is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Geelong
Posts: 2,617
Malcolm. I use GIMP quite a bit. As you know it will handle fit files, otherwise your working in 8 bit with tiff or jpeg, or 24 bit if using bmp - but the conversion needs to take place outside of GIMP.

It's a bit messy, but CinePaint, a GIMP derivative works in 32 bit which makes it good for converting files, but doesn't have the flexibility of the GIMP tools.

There are two tools that I use almost exclusively in GIMP, EAW Sharpen in local contrast mode (maximum 2 applications at default settings), and Sharpen (Smart Redux) using the refocus plugin and default settings.

These two are gentle applications and can be downloaded from the GIMP plugin repository, or in the case of Sharpen (Smart Redux) it's part of a package containing various Script-fu tools if your using Linux.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 20-11-2010, 11:55 AM
mswhin63's Avatar
mswhin63 (Malcolm)
Registered User

mswhin63 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Para Hills, South Australia
Posts: 3,620
Thanks Marc,

RC, EAW Sharpen is great, I am going to work with it just a tad, I don't have Linux so the other suggestion actually broke my GIMP for a short time until i removed it.

I am now working on a site to display my images, when completed I hope to show the higher res images for viewing.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 20-11-2010, 06:57 PM
rcheshire's Avatar
rcheshire (Rowland)
Registered User

rcheshire is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Geelong
Posts: 2,617
Eek! Broke GIMP? Pity. Sharpen (Smart Redux) applied before EAW Sharpen produces very good results.

I forgot to mention that your image is very good and helps me out with a question I had about the length of subs for this target.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 21-11-2010, 06:08 PM
midnight's Avatar
midnight (Darrin)
Always on the road

midnight is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Australind, WA
Posts: 891
Malcolm, I would be extremely happy with your narrow field attempt! There are hints of more data buried in there and your framing makes for a nice presentation.

Now that I have more time as our outage has finished, I'm hoping to get back into the yard and this shot has edged me along more to move into narrow field myself. Only problem is the east coast weather seems to have moved over here

Well done.

Darrin...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 21-11-2010, 07:38 PM
mswhin63's Avatar
mswhin63 (Malcolm)
Registered User

mswhin63 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Para Hills, South Australia
Posts: 3,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by midnight View Post
Only problem is the east coast weather seems to have moved over here
niticed too

I am considering ging back to the original image of 45 as i work with the 17 image version the noise levels get a bit high and not very flexible.

I seem to be having trouble letting this go.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 22-11-2010, 04:53 PM
that_guy's Avatar
that_guy (Tony)
Local Korean Millennial

that_guy is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Charleville
Posts: 2,063
I have no idea why this is in the beginners forum D: ITS SOO BLOODY GOOD!!! Awesome capture haha

cheers,
tony
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 22-11-2010, 06:01 PM
jjjnettie's Avatar
jjjnettie (Jeanette)
Registered User

jjjnettie is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Monto
Posts: 16,738
Wowee! Nice work!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 22-11-2010, 06:22 PM
jenchris's Avatar
jenchris (Jennifer)
Registered User

jenchris is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Ormeau Gold Coast
Posts: 2,067
There's nothing wrong with that shot at all - most people blow out the trapezium the slight graininess is a result of limitations not your fault.

Everything you've done is good!
Mind you, I know next to nothing about it!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 22-11-2010, 07:08 PM
mswhin63's Avatar
mswhin63 (Malcolm)
Registered User

mswhin63 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Para Hills, South Australia
Posts: 3,620
I appreciate the comments, seeing it was first proper attempt at dedepsky, I feel it belongs in the beginner section. I do like it as well not going to be able to try again till the moon subsides, but i have finally felt the bug and is hard to shake it.

I managed to print it out on A4 photo paper today and showed my son. Told him I shot the photo and he didn't believe me. It took convincing from my wife and my older son he finally accepted I shot it

I actually manage further detail from it again and this time went back to 43 stacks and 2 x Drizzled it in DSS. I would post it but it is currently 280MB file size.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement