Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Astrophotography and Imaging Equipment and Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 01-03-2021, 04:29 PM
JA
.....

JA is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,025
Light Pollution Measurement & Filter Comparison

Hello All,

PART 1 - Light Pollution

I thought I'd open a discussion on Light Pollution, its measurement and using filters to help reduce its effects. That might be a lot to bite off in one chunk, but when I thought of doing it in separate threads, that seemed like it would result in too much shuffling around.

Of course we all want the best views and photographs that come with a dark sky, but how do we get them? Move house? Travel to darker skies? Use light pollution or narrowband type filters?..... Any or all of the above.

When considering any of those possibilities the obvious question might be .... How much have I got to gain? That is where quality data comes in. It is possible to get light pollution (sky brightness) data for your area, suburb and even down to your street although it's somewhat questionable at that resolution.

Simply go to LightPollutionMap here.....
https://www.lightpollutionmap.info/#...FFFFFFFFFFFFFF and then enter your suburb/location and some options will come up. Choose the appropriate and then zero in on your location and you can get a light pollution reading of some sort. I prefer, in reference to the Light Blue Dialogue Box at the top right, to select the "World Atlas 2015" Dataset Overlay as this gives SQM readings, Bortle Number and the sky brightness readings in Candela/m^2, which to me are far more meaningful than those in the VIIRS datasets, more recent they may be. If I want to Update the World Atlas data to 2020, or whatever year I simply scale the World Altas 2015 reading to a "World Atlas 2020 reading" using the 2015 & 2020 radiance data from the VIIRS data. Close enough.

At my location in Melbourne LightPollutionMap reports the sky as Bortle 7 with an SQM of 18.84mag./arcsec^2 and most importantly for me, intuitively anyway, is the Sky Brightness reading = 3130 µcd/m^2. This compares with a "typical perfect dark sky site" of 171 µcd/m^2. So my background sky at the Zenith is approximately 18 times that at a perfect Dark Sky Site. I've been to a few dark sky zones, so being 18 times brighter puts things very much in to a linear perspective. I will return to that concept later.


PART 2 - Sky Brightness Measurement

So aside from getting your sky brightness data from sites such as LightPollutionMap you can measure it yourself with the benefit of it being ultra focused on your exact location and your local conditions. It is possible to use devices like the Unihedron (brand) Sky Quality Meter often simply referred to as an SQM meter for such measurements. See image below...
Click image for larger version

Name:	sqm-l_front_regular.jpg
Views:	8
Size:	52.3 KB
ID:	272622

There is a version with an approx 60degree field of view and an SQM-L model with a narrower 20 degree field of view that might be preferrable. They provide a Sky brightness measurement in units of magnitude per arcsecond squared. An excellent dark site will measure 22.0 Mag. per arcsecond squared which equates to the in my view far more meaningful sky brightness measure of 171 micro candela per square metre. Here is a conversion calculator to convert beteween these units:
http://www.unihedron.com/projects/darksky/magconv.php


INCOMPLETE......TO BE CONTINUED


PART 3 - Filter Candidates
PART 4 - Filter Initial Comparison
PART 5 - Filter Effectiveness

Last edited by JA; 07-03-2021 at 01:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-03-2021, 05:14 PM
Rerouter's Avatar
Rerouter (Ryan)
Registered User

Rerouter is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Sydney
Posts: 117
I can mainly add this to the discussion
https://web.science.mq.edu.au/~ross/...tex-notags.pdf

There method seemed to be to take a mosaic of the night sky with a fairly low focal length length, e.g. DSLR and compare the brightness against known star brightness, allowing a way to loosely calibrate brightness values off the stars,

I would expect this to allow you to find your sky glow spots, then you might be able to use a diy spectrometer e.g. https://publiclab.org/notes/homechem...n-spectrometer to narrow down how effective each filter might be,

Edit: i should add my site based on the website is 18,000ucd. However i have been investigating a kind of dark site that reports about 380ucs not too far a drive away. But I expect it to have some pretty horrible sky glow to the north and west

Last edited by Rerouter; 01-03-2021 at 06:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-03-2021, 05:29 PM
JA
.....

JA is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,025
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rerouter View Post
I can mainly add this to the discussion
https://web.science.mq.edu.au/~ross/...tex-notags.pdf

There method seemed to be to take a mosaic of the night sky with a fairly low focal length length, e.g. DSLR and compare the brightness against known star brightness, allowing a way to loosely calibrate brightness values off the stars,

I would expect this to allow you to find your sky glow spots, then you might be able to use a diy spectrometer e.g. https://publiclab.org/notes/homechem...n-spectrometer to narrow down how effective each filter might be,
Thanks Ryan. That's my next subject (TBC).... Measurement


Best
JA
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-03-2021, 05:42 PM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,922
If you don’t trust the published transmission curves from the commercial suppliers I can measure any/ all filters to determine the actual transmissions.
I can also measure a “sky” brightness to determine if there are any identifiable emission lines involved.
Let me know if I can assist.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-03-2021, 06:03 PM
JA
.....

JA is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,025
Quote:
Originally Posted by Merlin66 View Post
If you don’t trust the published transmission curves from the commercial suppliers I can measure any/ all filters to determine the actual transmissions.
I can also measure a “sky” brightness to determine if there are any identifiable emission lines involved.
Let me know if I can assist.
That's very generous of you Ken. It would be great to have something as quantitative as that to rely on and perhaps allow us to compare with manufacturer transmission curves.

Best
JA
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement