ICEINSPACE
Most Read Articles
Moon Phase
CURRENT MOON Waxing Crescent
4.9%
The Sun Now
Time Zones
Sydney
8:32 am
Perth
6:32 am
Auckland
10:32 am
New York*
6:32 pm
Paris*
12:32 am
GMT
10:32 pm




  #1  
Old 11-04-2017, 09:08 AM
bojan's Avatar
bojan
amateur

bojan is online now
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mt Waverley, VIC
Posts: 4,804
Dark energy... illusion or not?

Interesting read:
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/...illusion-12136

Last edited by bojan; 11-04-2017 at 09:09 AM. Reason: more info
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-04-2017, 11:13 AM
Robh's Avatar
Robh (Rob)
Registered User

Robh is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Blue Mountains, Australia
Posts: 1,299
Fascinating! It would be nice to be able to explain away dark energy in terms of inhomogeneities within the universe and known physics.

I wonder to what scale we really have to go to assume the universe is homogeneous. With known galactic filaments and huge structures such as the Sloan Great Wall, our observable universe isn't all that homogeneous.

Thanks for the post, Rob
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 13-04-2017, 08:16 AM
sil
Registered User

sil is online now
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canberra
Posts: 667
Hm, I fundamentally agree dark energy doesnt exist but for differing reasons. This acceleration of the universe has never sat well with me with how its "proven" with recent observations of ever older galaxies, which to me they are just seeing back in the past when accelaration from the "big bang event" would have been greater than now as I'd expect.

A lot of all this relies on measurements and constants that I feel are not accurate enough yet either, just too much guesswork going on it seems. Admitedly my maths isnt up to the task of even attempting to understand, let alone work through any of these papers.

I have encountered the assumption that figure rounding has no bearing on a simulation, it still gets you in the ballpark. In a venus transit project I contributed data on I was able to show that the simulation software was rounding a value from two to one decimal places and instead of projecting a straight path for venus across the sun it was an obvious banana curve which was clearly wrong and using actual observation data showed the rounding had to be present in their equation values even though it shouldn't have had any appreciable difference.

So I expect someone will take the time to review from scratch how to calculate the expansion rate accurately, then take precise data from observations to as good a precision as possible, and likewise to constants (which arent) and run the equations with full values until the very final result. Is there even s single source of truth data set in existance? I know things like the number of stars in a galaxy is an ever shifting estimate so if someone needs that value for a paper what would they use? We need a dataset that people can work through and add to that produces a final "cuurently accurate as of today" value instead of different groups having to redo the entire estimate in isolation every time.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 13-04-2017, 03:43 PM
OICURMT's Avatar
OICURMT
Oh, I See You Are Empty!

OICURMT is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Belair, SA
Posts: 1,235
Quote:
Originally Posted by sil View Post
Hm, I fundamentally agree dark energy doesnt exist but for differing reasons. This acceleration of the universe has never sat well with me with how its "proven" with recent observations of ever older galaxies, which to me they are just seeing back in the past when accelaration from the "big bang event" would have been greater than now as I'd expect.
I tend to lean this way. I like it because it is simple and has more common sense than the introduction of an imaginary friend. Having a simple function of c and G as a function of t seems an elegant solution.


Recent article -> https://www.theguardian.com/science/...soon-be-tested
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 13-04-2017, 10:45 PM
luka
Registered User

luka is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 705
Seen this yet?
Quote:
Researchers at the University of Waterloo have been able to capture the first composite image of a dark matter bridge that connects galaxies together. The scientists publish their work in a new paper in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 14-04-2017, 02:15 PM
avandonk's Avatar
avandonk
avandonk

avandonk is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,755
We can only go with any postulate on real evidence.

Telescopes are being planned to survey thousands of type 1A supernovae to pin down an expansion curve for our Universe.

The real problem is if you calculate the so called Dark Energy from Quantum Mechanics you end up being out by a factor of 10 to the power of 120!

This is the biggest error in the history of Physics. There has only been 10 to 27 seconds since the big bang.

There will be wild postulations to do with Dark Energy and Dark Matter. Most from uninformed sources.

All that matters is data from measurements or just more experiments.

Dark Energy and Dark Matter in Our Universe seems to be at just the correct level for all of us to even exist.

To me this is self evident! We are here because we are here!

Bert
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-06-2017, 08:46 AM
avandonk's Avatar
avandonk
avandonk

avandonk is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,755
Here is a very good talk by Sean Carroll on Dark Matter and or modifying Einstein's General Relativity.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uogQiH5Yx4

This is a very good talk as well on Quantum Field Theory.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEKSpZPByD0

The Universe consists of Quantum Fields rather than particles.

Bert
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-06-2017, 07:09 AM
tonybarry (Tony)
Registered User

tonybarry is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Penrith, Sydney
Posts: 511
This post reports on a recent paper that offers some verification of the emergent gravity hypothesis.

https://darkmatterdarkenergy.com/201...ndes-proposal/

Margaret Brouwer's check of galaxies is not the final word in the saga, but it does provide some evidence that the dark matter solution to galactic rotation velocity curves might not be the right answer.

Regards,
Tony Barry
WSAAG
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 19-06-2017, 01:48 PM
bojan's Avatar
bojan
amateur

bojan is online now
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mt Waverley, VIC
Posts: 4,804
Quote:
Originally Posted by tonybarry View Post
This post reports on a recent paper that offers some verification of the emergent gravity hypothesis.

https://darkmatterdarkenergy.com/201...ndes-proposal/

Margaret Brouwer's check of galaxies is not the final word in the saga, but it does provide some evidence that the dark matter solution to galactic rotation velocity curves might not be the right answer.

Regards,
Tony Barry
WSAAG
Arxiv paper is here.

However... there are other opinions:
https://www.technologyreview.com/s/4...nt-phenomenon/
http://physicsfromtheedge.blogspot.c...gravity-1.html

Last edited by bojan; 19-06-2017 at 02:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 19-06-2017, 08:17 PM
tonybarry (Tony)
Registered User

tonybarry is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Penrith, Sydney
Posts: 511
Thank you Bojan for the links. I read Mike McCulloch's brief posts and was intrigued. As he says,

Quote:
The variant of inertial-MoND was an inspiration to me, but MoND and MiHsC differ in their predictions and also in that MoND is only an empirical 'fit': it has to be fitted to the data by hand with a constant a0, and there is no physical reason given for it, whereas MiHsC is based on logic, has a good physical reason and predicts well without any arbitrary fitting. This is a profound advantage.
It's a good time to be alive, these problems are being looked at harder and harder than ever before. Something's gotta give.

Regards,
Tony Barry
WSAAG
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:32 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Tasco Australia
Advertisement
OzScopes Authorised Dealer
Advertisement
SkyWatcher Star Discovery
Advertisement
Atik One
Advertisement
Lunatico Astronomical
Advertisement
Meade Instruments
Advertisement
FLI Cameras and Imaging Accessories
Advertisement
Astronomy and Electronics Centre
Advertisement