Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 29-05-2014, 10:17 PM
Marko of Oz's Avatar
Marko of Oz (Mark)
Registered User

Marko of Oz is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Devonport, TAS
Posts: 328
Will a .5 focal reducer halve the power of a barlow?

I can't test this myself at the moment so I thought I'd ask.

For example, if I put a .5 focal reducer before my 5x powermate will that effectively make the powermate a 2.5x ?

cheers
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 30-05-2014, 12:06 AM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
Yes
raymo
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 30-05-2014, 11:51 AM
Marko of Oz's Avatar
Marko of Oz (Mark)
Registered User

Marko of Oz is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Devonport, TAS
Posts: 328
Sweet, can't wait to try it. More economical than forking out another $250 on a 2.5x powermate.

You read here and there about buying a barlow to double your eyepiece collection but no one ever says buy a focal reducer to double your number of eyepieces. Until now.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 30-05-2014, 02:22 PM
mental4astro's Avatar
mental4astro (Alexander)
kids+wife+scopes=happyman

mental4astro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: sydney, australia
Posts: 4,979
No, it's not that easy folks.

Barlows and focal reducers are not simple multipliers or dividers. They each work differently depending on the telescope - optical system- being used, and the design of the 'Barlow'. As a result, they add their own set of aberrations. Combine the two, and thing go to hell in a handbasket.

There is more than just one design of 'Barlow' multiplier or 'reducer'. Glass types and lens designs vary greatly for both. Many are scope design specific, others only work with a very specific instrument.

Depending on the telescope system, barlow will either work well across the whole field of view, or ONLY the inner area. Same for focal reducers. Couple them and the result is even more dodgy. There will be some combinations of Barlows and reducers that will work with a particular telescope system, but that depends on the type Barlow, the type of reducer AND the telescope system - chances are very slim to get a trifecta.

If you have Powermate and a reducer, then try it out. Only then will you see if the combination works with you scope/scopes. There's no free lunch here either...

Last edited by mental4astro; 30-05-2014 at 03:11 PM. Reason: bugger - left some important words out... fixed it now
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 30-05-2014, 02:52 PM
astro744
Registered User

astro744 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,244
I concur with mental4astro. Note also the 5x powermate magnifies up to 7.7x as the increase from the top surface increases. See http://www.televue.com/engine/TV3b_p...p#.U4gMOHKSy5I

If you have the 0.5x reducer and 5x Powermate try it and let us know, but I wouldn't buy a reducer expecting it to work. The 2.5x Powermate certainly will work. However note from the same chart above that the 2.5x Powermate magnifies less at an increasing distance from the top surface almost matching the 2x Powermate.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 30-05-2014, 03:26 PM
Amaranthus's Avatar
Amaranthus (Barry)
Thylacinus stargazoculus

Amaranthus is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Judbury, Tasmania
Posts: 1,203
I use a f/6.3 focal reducer/flattener and a PowerMate 2.5 in combination in my C8 and it works fine. I typically do this when I using the FR for a wider visual field, and then want to increase the magnification on a particular object without taking the FR out.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 30-05-2014, 07:07 PM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
I'm not a big fan of stacking elements to achieve the same result that can be achieved with fewer. One might get away with it for visual, but photography brings out the defects. Sometimes less is more.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 30-05-2014, 07:15 PM
Amaranthus's Avatar
Amaranthus (Barry)
Thylacinus stargazoculus

Amaranthus is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Judbury, Tasmania
Posts: 1,203
It works okay for visual and planetary cams, I would not do it for DSLR/CCD imaging!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement