ICEINSPACE
Moon Phase
CURRENT MOON
Waning Crescent 6.9%
|
|
14-08-2007, 03:04 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 936
|
|
Binoculars- exit pupil versus eye relief
hiya,
I am trying to decide between these binoculars:
AOE - 10x50HR
or
AOE - 9x60
The reason for the difficulty is simply trying to decide the most important factors between eye-relief and exit pupil.
My wife and I wear glasses and are mid-30's.
So, is Eye relief or exit pupil of greater importance.
For the 10x50HR's:
Exit pupil = 5 mm
Eye-relief = 23 mm
Weight = 900g
For the 9x60's:
Exit pupil = 6.7 mm
Eye-relief = 21 mm
Weight = 1.2 kg
We will take these bushwalking and will most likely be lying down or against a rock when viewing.
thanks for any comments.
cheers,
DJDD
|
14-08-2007, 03:10 PM
|
|
Starcatcher
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gerringong
Posts: 8,534
|
|
Seems that you are talking predominantly daytime use? Under those conditions, surely your pupils are no where near fully dilated (maybe only 2-3mm dilated at most?? Check some references?) so exit pupil is probably not an issue for this use. I'd suggest then that you go for the best eye relief and the best magnification at the smallest aperture that gives you a manageable weight to carry while walking. But if you wanted to use them to look at the night sky as well, that's a different story!
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJDD
hiya,
I am trying to decide between these binoculars:
AOE - 10x50HR
or
AOE - 9x60
The reason for the difficulty is simply trying to decide the most important factors between eye-relief and exit pupil.
My wife and I wear glasses and are mid-30's.
So, is Eye relief or exit pupil of greater importance.
For the 10x50HR's:
Exit pupil = 5 mm
Eye-relief = 23 mm
Weight = 900g
For the 9x60's:
Exit pupil = 6.7 mm
Eye-relief = 21 mm
Weight = 1.2 kg
We will take these bushwalking and will most likely be lying down or against a rock when viewing.
thanks for any comments.
cheers,
DJDD
|
|
14-08-2007, 03:15 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 936
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by erick
Seems that you are talking predominantly daytime use? Under those conditions, surely your pupils are no where near fully dilated (maybe only 2-3mm dilated at most?? Check some references?) so exit pupil is probably not an issue for this use. I'd suggest then that you go for the best eye relief and the best magnification at the smallest aperture that gives you a manageable weight to carry while walking. But if you wanted to use them to look at the night sky as well, that's a different story!
|
thanks, eric, for the *prompt* reply.
actually, I meant primarily night time use. I would rarely use them during the day (maybe occasionally looking at a bird or distant object).
sorry for the confusion!
DJDD
|
14-08-2007, 03:40 PM
|
|
Starcatcher
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gerringong
Posts: 8,534
|
|
In that case we start again
What I read suggests young healthy eyes open to pupil size around 7mm and ancient eyes like mine might struggle to 5+mm. Let's presume that you will both be closer to the 7mm. As I understand it, any binoculars producing an exit pupil greater that 7mm will produce an image that is bigger than your eye can see. I understand that, therefore, you lose some of the light being collected and focussed by the binoculars. If you are an extremist, this probably matters. If you are not, than you probably wouldn't get too fussed. But within reason. I wouldn't get a pair of binoculars that produced a 9mm exit pupil for my use under dark skies. If I can stick to 5mm or less, and all the other factors are OK, then I'll do that.
Now, if you read some of the articles, they go to extraordinary lengths describing all the parameters and how they interact. I've seen arguments for and against which is the most important. Do your own searchs for such articles so you can make up your own mind. AOE have useful info on their site. See also the articles in this forum (at left). Go reading here:-
http://www.cloudynights.com/ubbthrea...ard/binoculars
probably in the "Best of..." thread.
However, eye relief is pretty important, it seems to me. If the eye relief isn't sufficient, then your whole viewing experience is pretty poor. Unlike if you are losing 20-30% of the image through exit pupil mismatch - then you get 70-80% of the "experience", not 0%. Other factors such as weight, magnification are resolved through good mounts etc. Obviously, the largest aperture you can get and good multicoatings throughout the binoculars are very important for faint fuzzies.
My thoughts.
Eric
|
14-08-2007, 04:06 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 936
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by erick
In that case we start again
What I read suggests young healthy eyes open to pupil size around 7mm and ancient eyes like mine might struggle to 5+mm.
|
Quote:
Let's presume that you will both be closer to the 7mm. As I understand it, any binoculars producing an exit pupil greater that 7mm will produce an image that is bigger than your eye can see. I understand that, therefore, you lose some of the light being collected and focussed by the binoculars. If you are an extremist, this probably matters. If you are not, than you probably wouldn't get too fussed. But within reason. I wouldn't get a pair of binoculars that produced a 9mm exit pupil for my use under dark skies. If I can stick to 5mm or less, and all the other factors are OK, then I'll do that.
|
that sounds very reasonable.
Quote:
Now, if you read some of the articles, they go to extraordinary lengths describing all the parameters and how they interact. I've seen arguments for and against which is the most important. Do your own searchs for such articles so you can make up your own mind. AOE have useful info on their site. See also the articles in this forum (at left). Go reading here:-
http://www.cloudynights.com/ubbthrea...ard/binoculars
probably in the "Best of..." thread.
|
Google is usually my first point of call but i have found this forum is so helpful and useful that I completely forgot to use google.
That forum is great and the best of topic is very useful. I subscribed immediately!
Quote:
However, eye relief is pretty important, it seems to me. If the eye relief isn't sufficient, then your whole viewing experience is pretty poor. Unlike if you are losing 20-30% of the image through exit pupil mismatch - then you get 70-80% of the "experience", not 0%. Other factors such as weight, magnification are resolved through good mounts etc. Obviously, the largest aperture you can get and good multicoatings throughout the binoculars are very important for faint fuzzies.
|
From your comments and some further reading I have done in the last hour or so (what else is work time for except planning my next purchase and extra-curricular activities?) it seems eye-relief will probably be the most important factor for me. certainly, some of the skies are so bright with stars out where we walk that it would be hard to say if I would get full dilation.
certainly, everyone seems happy with 10x50's, as well..
cheers,
DJDD
|
14-08-2007, 05:00 PM
|
|
Starcatcher
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gerringong
Posts: 8,534
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJDD
...... some of the skies are so bright with stars out where we walk that it would be hard to say if I would get full dilation.
|
Where's zat? I wanta' walk your way!
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJDD
certainly, everyone seems happy with 10x50's, as well..
|
Well, I bought AOE's 12x60s, and I think they are super.
|
14-08-2007, 05:13 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 936
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by erick
Where's zat? I wanta' walk your way!
|
well, most anywhere on the bogong high plains in VIC, etc. although the best place I think (with my limited experience in astronomy) would be Mt Speculation (not really the Bogong High Plains area but in the alpine region of VIC). When it is clear it is very bright out- no haziness but bright enough to walk without tripping over at all. crazy!
of course, it is a long way to walk only to find the skies cloudy.
Quote:
Well, I bought AOE's 12x60s, and I think they are super.
|
I think I will buy the 10x50's as the eye relief seems quite important and I am on the older side of mid-30's so exit pupil will only deteriorate.
cheers,
DJDD
|
14-08-2007, 07:13 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Geraldton, WA
Posts: 1,440
|
|
I've been using my old 10x50 (S/H) Nikons for the last 15 years and still find them good for me at 60. Just bought a pair of 20x80's but that was more for the bigger light bucket than anything else The Nikons exit pupil is 5mm and I think the 80's are 4mm which still suits me fine. 10x50's will give you many years of use starting at late 30's and they are lighter for hand holding than the bigger aperture bino's.
|
14-08-2007, 11:01 PM
|
|
Starcatcher
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gerringong
Posts: 8,534
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJDD
...of course, it is a long way to walk only to find the skies cloudy.
|
especially with my 8" dob strapped to my back
|
15-08-2007, 08:54 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 936
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenhuon
I've been using my old 10x50 (S/H) Nikons for the last 15 years and still find them good for me at 60. Just bought a pair of 20x80's but that was more for the bigger light bucket than anything else The Nikons exit pupil is 5mm and I think the 80's are 4mm which still suits me fine. 10x50's will give you many years of use starting at late 30's and they are lighter for hand holding than the bigger aperture bino's.
|
thanks for the reply, Glenhuon.
It sounds to me that the 10x50's are a great all round choice that will last for a long time.
And that exit pupil, whilst important for a novice like me that wears glasses, is probably of lesser importance than eye relief.
cheers,
DJDD
|
15-08-2007, 08:56 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 936
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by erick
especially with my 8" dob strapped to my back
|
you know, I thought about that last night but decided it is not feasible.
cheers,
DJDD
|
15-08-2007, 09:26 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 936
|
|
well, the AOE 10x50HR binoculars have been ordered.
hopefully they will arrive early next week so I can get some practice in before the lunar eclipse.
thanks for everyone's advice and comments,
DJDD
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:47 PM.
|
|