Thanks Mike. Nice to know - but I may need more patience to go much deeper!
Superb picture Paul. No patience needed to go deeper. The good thing about digital is you can do a couple of hours next year, and the next year, and...
A good picture can always be added to at leisure.
Superb picture Paul. No patience needed to go deeper. The good thing about digital is you can do a couple of hours next year, and the next year, and...
A good picture can always be added to at leisure.
Nice one Paul! Love this galaxy. I've been eyeing it off myself, but imaging that far to the north is a bit awkward for me due to a large tree on a neighbouring property behind the observatory. I could probably get 1.5-2hrs on it a night, so maybe I'll give it a shot at some point.
Looks like you've you've got some nice sharp data there. I suspect with 13.8hrs of data on this one you might have gotten away with less noise reduction, which might help bring out the details a bit better.
I'd also be inclined to rotate it 90 degrees anti-clockwise as Andy suggested.
Nice one Paul! Love this galaxy. I've been eyeing it off myself, but imaging that far to the north is a bit awkward for me due to a large tree on a neighbouring property behind the observatory. I could probably get 1.5-2hrs on it a night, so maybe I'll give it a shot at some point.
Looks like you've you've got some nice sharp data there. I suspect with 13.8hrs of data on this one you might have gotten away with less noise reduction, which might help bring out the details a bit better.
I'd also be inclined to rotate it 90 degrees anti-clockwise as Andy suggested.
Thanks Lee. I might try a repro - not least because I'm busy going through my recently arrived new copy of the second edition of Warren Keller's PI book!
Thanks Allan. I'll have a play and see what I can do. Much appreciated.
Hi Paul,
I could have a go if you want me to but
I think you've already over processed the background -
it looks like it's been blurred slightly to reduce noise?
That blur might have got into the galaxy as well unless you masked it?
Hi Paul,
I could have a go if you want me to but
I think you've already over processed the background -
it looks like it's been blurred slightly to reduce noise?
That blur might have got into the galaxy as well unless you masked it?
cheers
Allan
The galaxy was masked out during the main noise reduction. As I said, I'll probably reprocess anyway as I want to try a few new tricks. Thanks though.