Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > ATM and DIY Projects
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 31-01-2015, 05:14 PM
niko's Avatar
niko
Registered User

niko is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 1,053
DIY Pier

$200 bucks at the steel fabricators and a few afternoons for some rough as guts welding and I'm almost there
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (image.jpg)
126.6 KB100 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 31-01-2015, 06:41 PM
AndrewJ
Watch me post!

AndrewJ is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,905
Gday Niko

Looks nice
Just for info tho, it would make for a stiffer assy if the gusset plates
were rotated 45deg so that they lined up with the bolt holes in the base.
That would remove a lot of the "possible" flexure.

Andrew
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 31-01-2015, 10:31 PM
traveller's Avatar
traveller (Bo)
Not enough time and money

traveller is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,133
Looking good niko,
When will you start digging
Bo
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-02-2015, 12:08 AM
jenchris's Avatar
jenchris (Jennifer)
Registered User

jenchris is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Ormeau Gold Coast
Posts: 2,067
Put the bolt holes next to the gussets.
nice start
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-02-2015, 11:00 AM
niko's Avatar
niko
Registered User

niko is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 1,053
will moving the bolt holes next to the gussets really make that much difference given that I intend to only use an ED80 or ED120?

cheers

niko
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-02-2015, 11:07 AM
Kunama
...

Kunama is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 3,588
Quote:
Originally Posted by niko View Post
will moving the bolt holes next to the gussets really make that much difference given that I intend to only use an ED80 or ED120?

cheers

niko
Really depends on the bottom plate thickness. Most of these piers are over engineered by a big factor, understandable with the old mounts from bygone years but the quality of the current mounts means that not much vibration is produced.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-02-2015, 11:26 AM
niko's Avatar
niko
Registered User

niko is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 1,053
thanks Matt - plate thickness is 20mm and the likelihood of getting more holes cut is unlikely unless there's a real and significant benefit
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-02-2015, 02:44 PM
AndrewJ
Watch me post!

AndrewJ is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,905
Gday Niko

In your case, its probably not going to be a problem, just it is good practice to try and remove any areas of possible flexing, and bolt joles near the gussets removes a lot of "possible" flex at the base, as does eliminating rat cages if you can.
( And remember we are talking arcsecs here )
Most piers are over analysed anyway.
Unless you actually hit the pier, the only things that will affect it are
a) Ground vibrations
b) Possible resonances set up by the scopes drive when tracking

a) Is very difficult to deal with and b) requires a proper engineering analysis of the exact setup,.


Andrew
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-02-2015, 06:40 PM
niko's Avatar
niko
Registered User

niko is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 1,053
Thanks for the comments guys. I'm pretty excited. Need to dig the hole now before my shoulder gets replaced and puts me out of action for a few months.. Site to be mutually agreed between the keen amateur astronomer and the cynical observer!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement