Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 13-04-2012, 09:56 AM
Lester's Avatar
Lester
Registered User

Lester is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: E.P. S.A.
Posts: 4,963
Strange= galaxy PGC3097159

Hi all, last night I tried for comet Metcalf/Brewington and missed the FOV with the Astrograph. Thought I would still process the stack of exposures to see what I had. Well at the exact postion of galaxy PGC3097159 there is this red object. That galaxy is listed in The Sky6 pro at magnitude 30 and size=0". So way too faint and small to show up here. I thought is may be a nebula, but nothing in my program.

I am sure it is not camera noise as such a large red area hasn't shown up before with the Astro 40D.

Any sensible thoughts welcome.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (12-4-12f3.3-12x4minISO1600cropgalaxypgcFinal.jpg)
180.8 KB89 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 13-04-2012, 10:49 AM
astroron's Avatar
astroron (Ron)
Supernova Searcher

astroron is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cambroon Queensland Australia
Posts: 9,315
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lester View Post
Hi all, last night I tried for comet Metcalf/Brewington and missed the FOV with the Astrograph. Thought I would still process the stack of exposures to see what I had. Well at the exact postion of galaxy PGC3097159 there is this red object. That galaxy is listed in The Sky6 pro at magnitude 30 and size=0". So way too faint and small to show up here. I thought is may be a nebula, but nothing in my program.

I am sure it is not camera noise as such a large red area hasn't shown up before with the Astro 40D.

Any sensible thoughts welcome.
Lester, you could try NED or SEDS to get the true mag of the galaxy
PGC3097159.
Even the largest of telescopes have trouble getting down to mag 30, so I think "THE SKY" Six is in error.
I think you should not have too much trouble getting down to mag 20 or so in your scope with long exposures.
Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 13-04-2012, 11:00 AM
Lester's Avatar
Lester
Registered User

Lester is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: E.P. S.A.
Posts: 4,963
Thanks Ron for your reply, I will look into it a bit further. Although I am sure what ever I got has nothing to do with such a distant faint galaxy, just that it is in the same position.

All the best.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 13-04-2012, 12:20 PM
thunderchildobs
Registered User

thunderchildobs is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ipswich, Qld, Aust
Posts: 607
In TheSky Mag 30 and size = 0 general indicates that details of the object are not known.

Brendan
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 13-04-2012, 01:41 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 7,866
Smudge
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 13-04-2012, 01:55 PM
Lester's Avatar
Lester
Registered User

Lester is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: E.P. S.A.
Posts: 4,963
Rob K. To the rescue again. Found unlisted nebula on D.S plate.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 13-04-2012, 02:16 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 7,866
Thought as much but didn't won't to say and make myself sound stupid the colour just didn't look right for a galaxy
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 13-04-2012, 02:53 PM
rogerg's Avatar
rogerg (Roger)
Registered User

rogerg is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 4,563
Interesting object.

Agree with Brendan, mag 30 in TheSky means the TheSky database doesn't know the magnitude, and makes me question it's other information about such an object.

Do a query for "galaxies" brighter than mag 15 from TheSky, photograph each one, and it's amazing what objects will turn up. Globular Clusters are surprisingly common as well as open clusters, you'd think they would be properly cataloged at least.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 13-04-2012, 04:21 PM
PeterM
Registered User

PeterM is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,997
Hi Lester,

If you don't already have it this site is very useful. A search by name of object or co-ordinates will give you a DSS image of the area.
http://archive.stsci.edu/cgi-bin/dss_form


The NED site that Ron refers to is listed below below and can be searched by a host of criteria.
http://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/

Yup Roger is right, it wasn't that long ago that NGC5189 in Musca was classed as a galaxy and is now classed as a planetary nebula - The Spiral Planetary in Musca

Did you end up finding a Sky6 Pro?
PeterM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 13-04-2012, 04:44 PM
Lester's Avatar
Lester
Registered User

Lester is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: E.P. S.A.
Posts: 4,963
Thanks for your comments everyone, I appreciate them.

Yes Peter I got a copy of The Sky6 Pro from chap on IIS and also got your extra stars loaded into it. Works well. Thanks for those links I will save them for future reference.

All the best.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 13-04-2012, 05:04 PM
mill's Avatar
mill (Martin)
sword collector

mill is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Mount Evelyn
Posts: 2,922
Lester it is PLN201-4.10 and it is a planetary nebula.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 13-04-2012, 05:30 PM
Lester's Avatar
Lester
Registered User

Lester is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: E.P. S.A.
Posts: 4,963
Hi Martin, thanks for that info. It must be a large diameter planetary to show up so large with only 500mm focal length.

All the best.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 14-04-2012, 07:48 PM
Ross G
Registered User

Ross G is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cherrybrook, NSW
Posts: 5,006
Good capture lester.

Ross.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 14-04-2012, 08:35 PM
Lester's Avatar
Lester
Registered User

Lester is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: E.P. S.A.
Posts: 4,963
Thanks Ross.

All the best.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 15-04-2012, 12:52 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,176
Lucky you didn't process that one away...I probably would have

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 15-04-2012, 02:21 PM
Lester's Avatar
Lester
Registered User

Lester is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: E.P. S.A.
Posts: 4,963
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
Lucky you didn't process that one away...I probably would have

Mike
LOL Mike.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement