G'day Sunfish, and thanks. Funnily enough, there is an analogy with digital
and analogue sound. Analogue sound[for example vinyl] reproduced on
high quality equipment is superior to what you get from a CD or DVD played through the same sound system. Digital sound as used on CDs etc: is not
continuous, it comes in extremely brief bits, chunks, whatever, from memory
46 per second, which produces what sound engineers call "brilliant" sound,
meaning hard or crystalline, lacking in warmth/ depth.
With digital/film, film has that special something, which is that digital looks
extremely "clean" because all edges are more sharply defined, and film is
"rougher" at the edges, doesn't look so somehow artificial. Most people these
days are not aware that a lot of professional imaging is still done on film,in
fact most pro landscape imagers use film. All movies were done on film until 2014, the number has dwindled since then, but some still are. Film also handles over exposure much better than digital, which is another plus.
I don't know what started me off on this diatribe, sorry, I must stop now.
raymo
I forgot your question. The image in the eyepiece was of course inverted, so I had to stand on my head to get the image.