The last tally was zero positives, 5 misses and many clouded or winded outs. This is one that got away.
On the uncertainty, 1-Sigma, 2-Sigma, should I observe or not. Tony is spot-on...
Quote:
Originally Posted by tonybarry
the aim of the game is to observe and let the chips fall where they may
|
and the uncertainty zones are a reflection of the uncertainty in the position of the star and the orbit of the asteroid.
On the position of the star, this was a 2UCAC cataloge prediction and it is useful to have a look at the Catalogue Comparison plot that is available in Dave Herald's "Occult" and can be accessed through Hristo's Occult Watcher if you have the Add-In and Occult installed. See a screen-shot below...
DaveH's and Hristo's comments on the plot, that were posted on the RAZNZoccsec group were...
***************
Re: [RASNZoccultations] 49 Pales - Tonight
I fear the situation is even more complex....
The fact that PPMXL has not used the PPMX position is an indication of problems.
And as I state in the Help topic:
If the PPMXL position has been taken from PPMX, the 3rd flag will be set to 'P'. If the star is in both PPMXL and PPMX, and the 3rd flag in PPMX is 'O', the PPMXL position may be preferable.
Looking at the individual catalogues: UCAC2 and 3 have essentially the same position at imaging epoch. The differences are all proper motion. Comparing the other catalogue positions (incl. the CMC14 position) , I'm inclined to think that the old epoch position(s) for this star are bad, and that the proper motion is small. My inclination is that the PPMXL position may be the best guide (or certainly the PPMXL proper motions) - which means the the path will probably be a good path-width south of predicted.
Dave Herald
Canberra, Australia
----- Original Message -----
From: Hristo Pavlov
To:
RASNZoccultations@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 11:08 AM
Subject: Re: [RASNZoccultations] 49 Pales - Tonight
Hi DaveG,
I agree with you about the catalog comparison interpretation but I think the shift may be smaller. UCAC3 position doesn't have proper motion so if you use the UCAC2 or PPMX proper motion for the UCAC3 position you will end up somewhere between the 2U and PPMX predictions. So I recon 1/2 path width shift to the left/south. Which still means if you are in Melbourne you'll get central event. But I wont be surprised from a 1 path width shift for a central event over Wellington/Nelson.
Hristo.
*************
I'm 100% certain Dave and Hristo won't mind me reproducing their posts here.
The take-home message is that the true position of any star is uncertain. Sometimes the catalogue comparison plots show a 180 degree diagreement. If you are in the 1-Sigma zone - observe. if you are in the 2-Sigma zone - observe if you can.
And... An Asteroid Occultation is the toughest test there is of any star catalogue.
Observe more - worry less!
DaveGault