Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 04-11-2012, 09:45 AM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 17,907
The future of Astrophotography camera chips?

CMOS has been developed further with the introduction of Scientific CMOS chips.

They seem to be quite a bit superior to their CCD counterparts. I can see being able capturing fainter details with one of these chips as the read noise is a fraction of CCDs.

Its early days and the first chip is only 5.5 megapixels but the low noise, high QE, fast frame rate with antiblooming could mean CCDs will have significant competition in the next few years.

If this line is successful we could see a future where CCDs are not so popular anymore.

http://www.scmos.com/

There is a downloadable paper on these chips if you are interested in reading more about it.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-11-2012, 12:36 PM
blink138's Avatar
blink138 (Pat)
Registered User

blink138 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: perth w.a.
Posts: 2,275
that looks as though it will be amazing
interesting too that one of its possible uses will be in adaptive optics
pat
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-11-2012, 10:06 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 17,907
Yes they do look to be very promising. It probably will be some time before they make their way down to a dedicated astro camera.

I like the way they promote one use of the chip as Lucky Astronomy.
Not sure what that is exactly.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-11-2012, 10:46 PM
naskies's Avatar
naskies (Dave)
Registered User

naskies is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,865
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley View Post
I like the way they promote one use of the chip as Lucky Astronomy.
Not sure what that is exactly.
I think they're referring to the max 100 fps frame rate, e.g. what the amateur planetary imagers do to get sharper images:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucky_imaging
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-11-2012, 12:40 AM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,113
Had a read of the link, in very low light CCD's are clearly superior, as well as having significantly better dynamic range (sCMOS are currently targeting 12 bit, ok, but not great ).

Also the elephant in the room is comparing 5-20 minute exposures (smear??? are you kidding? ) with 1-2000th of a second.

sCMOS looks the way in the latter... very likely to be planet-cam of choice in the future...but due the gate structure etc. overheads, it will take some very clever design to displace pure sensor pixel space as in CCD's

Very interesting post just the same
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-11-2012, 02:14 PM
Poita (Peter)
Registered User

Poita is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NSW Country
Posts: 3,586
I think this is what Jack Mallincam is using in his new planetary imager isn't he?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 10:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement