Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 10-04-2015, 06:50 PM
Matthias (Matt)
Registered User

Matthias is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Mornington Penninsula, Vic
Posts: 1
Stepping up to Astrophotography

Hello hello everyone!

I have a question (a common one, i bet ) in regards to getting started with astrophotography. Specifically about the large selection of hardware available to choose from!

For a bit of background i currently own a 12'' lightbridge dob which gives me pretty enjoyable views of the moon, planets and the brightest DSOs. After getting a grasp on focusing and locating DSOs quite easily (and wanting the family to see why i trek out in the middle of the night) i've decided i want to take the step into astrophotography for mainly DSOs (but not forgetting planets from time to time)!

I'd love to know what equipment/telescopes/cameras you guys would recommend for getting into snapping some beautiful shots of the skies.

For the software side of things i'm quite confident in using both Photoshop and GIMP for processing i just don't want to make the wrong first choice!

Thanks in advance fellas!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-04-2015, 01:16 PM
kens (Ken)
Registered User

kens is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 314
Astrophotography gear covers a huge spectrum. I'd recommend to look at the pics in this and other forums to see what you think you'd like to produce then check out what equipment was used and what it costs. Then use that as a guide for follow up questions as everyone has a different setup.
Apart from that, the common answer is: start with a decent mount.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-04-2015, 01:26 PM
glend (Glen)
Registered User

glend is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Lake Macquarie
Posts: 7,054
As Ken said a good tracking mount is essential for all but the brightest objects that can be shot with short exposures. It is possible to photograph through your dob, others have. However for DSOs you will need an equatorial goto mount that can handle the weight of the scope your using plus the imaging gear. Diving right into CCD camera, filters, etc can get expensive and frustrating, most people start off with a DSLR camera that is suitable for astrophotgraphy (not all are). There are a number of intro to astrophotography articles on the web that would be good to read. Be prepared for a learning curve and be patient.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-04-2015, 05:32 PM
elken2004 (Australia)
Registered User

elken2004 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: boronia
Posts: 35
Also look into the post processing too, taking the photos is only half of it all.
I have spent hours trying different ones. but once you have a handle on it it produces some fantastic results.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 13-04-2015, 05:57 AM
ZeroID's Avatar
ZeroID (Brent)
Lost in Space ....

ZeroID is offline
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 4,949
As Ken & Glen say, start slow and build up. It is not an easy 'jump in and go' path.

Your 12" DOB is not a good photographic starting point. Better is a smallish refractor and DSLR and T.Ring. 10 second avi movies of the moon, Sun spots ( Baader filter required of course) and Planets. Any of these can be accomplished with a decent tripod for short videos that can be stacked and processed although better of course is an EQ mount. My first was a little EQ2 with a brick hanging underneath to steady it.

High ISO might give you acceptable Globulars in single frames through the DOB.

Nebulae and Deep Skly Objects require a mount, the bigger the better. Minimum would be EQ5 but an EQ6 is better. And from there still continue with the smallish refractor. My 80mm f11 Skywatcher Achro actually produces quite good planetary videos although my main imaging scope is 102mm ED f7 Lunt. The 80mm f11 is normally my visual checking scope.

After that comes guiding, connectivity, AND THEN you better have gotten processing under some control because you will have heaps of images and need a bigger PC.

The DSLR, Refractor, tripod\mount will get you going. Get a T-Ring and try the globular single frame suggestion.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 13-04-2015, 01:51 PM
Slawomir's Avatar
Slawomir (Suavi)
Registered User

Slawomir is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: North Queensland
Posts: 3,240
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeroID View Post
My first was a little EQ2 with a brick hanging underneath to steady it.


My first setup was a 6" Newtonian 1200mm focal length on EQ3 without motors...shooting at 1.2 arc seconds per pixel...what was I thinking!

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeroID View Post
The DSLR, Refractor, tripod\mount will get you going. Get a T-Ring and try the globular single frame suggestion.
I totally second that. The smallest possible refractor (a triplet if money allows it) coupled with a DSLR and a decent tripod (or even better motorised mount) will certainly provide with a lot of fun.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 16-04-2015, 06:51 PM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
DSO photography is the more expensive option. Planetary you can do right now with your present scope if you have a camera. Maybe start with that first?

Take a look in the beginners photography forum for what people use to start out with.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement