Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 24-11-2019, 02:33 PM
pfitzgerald's Avatar
pfitzgerald (Paul)
Registered User

pfitzgerald is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 623
A Fifth Force?

Sounds very interesting.

https://www.9news.com.au/world/scien...c-bb22199b5998

What do others think?

Paul
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 24-11-2019, 03:10 PM
glend (Glen)
Registered User

glend is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Lake Macquarie
Posts: 7,054
I am still coming to grips with the First Order.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 24-11-2019, 03:47 PM
gary
Registered User

gary is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Mt. Kuring-Gai
Posts: 5,929
Apparently claims of having discovered a 5th fundamental force have
come out of this particular Hungarian lab before.

See this Quanta Magazine article 7th June 2016 :-
https://www.quantamagazine.org/new-b...tiny-20160607/

Quote:
Originally Posted by Natalie Wolchover, Senior Writer/Editor, Quanta Magazine
But when coverage of the fifth-force theory and plans to test it appeared recently in Nature News, Naviliat-Cuncic, who does nuclear-decay experiments, read it with raised eyebrows. “It seems that people get excited about it, but do not go and read [the Hungarian group’s] past work,” he said.

The Atomki group has produced three previous papers on their beryllium-8 experiments — conference proceedings in 2008, 2012 and 2015. The first paper claimed evidence of a new boson of mass 12 MeV, and the second described an anomaly corresponding to a 13.45-MeV boson. (The third was a preliminary version of the Physical Review Letters paper.) The first two bumps have disappeared in the latest data, collected with an improved experimental setup. “The new claim now is [a] boson with a mass of 16.7 MeV,” Naviliat-Cuncic said. “But they don’t say anything about what went wrong in their previous claims and why we should not take those claims seriously.” One naturally wonders, he said, “Is this value that they quote now going to change in the next four years?”
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 24-11-2019, 09:51 PM
Wavytone
Registered User

Wavytone is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Killara, Sydney
Posts: 4,147
Belongs in the Journal of Irreproducible Results, which happens to be printed on round paper to conveniently fit the round file.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 26-11-2019, 11:30 AM
Mr.tristan (Tristan)
Registered User

Mr.tristan is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: LOWER MITCHAM
Posts: 7
Let's be sceptical until it's peer reviewed...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 01:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement