#1  
Old 22-02-2011, 04:04 PM
dannat's Avatar
dannat (Daniel)
daniel

dannat is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Macedon shire, Australia
Posts: 3,379
Canon 24mm f2.8 for wide

Am thinking of the above lens for w/f shots? For the price at 350 from dwi seems good value, a there any alternatives I should consider, I would use it for meteors & wide landscapes
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 22-02-2011, 04:49 PM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,158
Dan,

I'm not sure if that is wide enough on a crop sensor body for widefields.

The 24mm becomes 38.4mm on a non-full frame sensor. You might find it's not really wide enough.

But, I think that's as wide as it gets before treading into L-series glass in the 14mm range.

I can't remember if I had this lens or the 28mm f/2.8. I think it was the 28mm and it was quite faithful.

H
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 23-02-2011, 01:26 AM
Waxing_Gibbous's Avatar
Waxing_Gibbous (Peter)
Grumpy Old Man-Child

Waxing_Gibbous is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South Gippsland
Posts: 1,768
Haitch is correct (as he usually is). But unless you want the whole Milky way in one go the 24 should be good.
The problem with the 14L is not just the cost but the utility. Even on an APS-C sensor, its going to be pretty wide.
If you can rent one from Teds or Michaels to try that might be a good path to see if you actually have a use for it other than widefield AP.
I believe Sigma offers a range of decent wide-angles in Canon mounts at about 1/2-2/3 the price, so thats another option.
For some reviews, check out: www.fredmiranda.com or www.photozone.de .

The latter is an excellent site as it reviews owner's donated lenses rather than cherry-picked examples. As a result, its also free from "I bought one" bias.
Happy snaps!
PJH
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 23-02-2011, 05:20 AM
luigi
Registered User

luigi is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 438
I like the 28 2.8 more than the 24 2.8
For a crop sensor you can try a Sigma 20mm 1.8 stopped down to F2.8 or F4 it can be quite good for wide field images.
If a lens is not wide enough you can always stitch, aim for optical quality first.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 23-02-2011, 06:36 AM
dannat's Avatar
dannat (Daniel)
daniel

dannat is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Macedon shire, Australia
Posts: 3,379
Thanks for the input, i don't think I'll get a sigma for now, I gabby been convinced to get diff, son will prob gonfor the 24.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 03:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Meade Australia
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
OzScopes Authorised Dealer
Advertisement
SkyWatcher Australia
Advertisement
NexDome Observatories
Advertisement
Celestron Australia
Advertisement
Lunatico Astronomical
Advertisement
Astronomy and Electronics Centre
Advertisement