Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Talk
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 06-11-2011, 10:28 PM
Cam's Avatar
Cam (Cam)
Registered User

Cam is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Maryborough Vic Australia
Posts: 178
Magnification

Had trouble focusing an eyepiece.Hope I have done the calculations right, maybe someone could correct me if Im wrong.
Im new to astronomy. I have an 8" f6 Dob. Ive been told up to 50x magnification per inch of aperture. I was out the other night observing the skies and tried a 4mm planetary II eyepiece that by my calculations gives me 304.8 x mag(38x per inch)and I just couldnt focus it.I also have an Explore Scientific 82 degree FOV 14mm (definately my favourite so far) which gives 87x only 10.8 x per inch.. I can barlow up the 14 mm x2 and even x3 giving me 261 x mag (32.6x per inch) and the views are great. really enjoyed checking out Jupiter, eta carina nebula and tarantula nebula and 47 Tuc.. Now what Im wondering.. If my calculations are correct a 5mm eyepiece would give me 243.8 x mag coming in even under the 3x barlowed 14mm. Can 1mm difference in focal length of an eyepiece really make this much difference??? Did the "seeing" suck??? Or is this it??? Is around 30x mag per inch of aperture more realistic??? Ive also been told by someone recently that over 250 x mag is rarely supported by the atmosphere..Is that correct??? Think I already need more aperture lol Im hooked!!!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-11-2011, 10:40 PM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,453
Mate you are pushing it to the outer limits, 50x per inch is just to much, 25 to 30 will be most beneficial and your views would be much better.

Leon
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-11-2011, 10:55 PM
Cam's Avatar
Cam (Cam)
Registered User

Cam is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Maryborough Vic Australia
Posts: 178
Thanks Leon. So the "seeing" would have been ok then? Maybe I should have bought a 5mm TMB instead of the 4mm.. Oh well live and learn haha. Thanks for ya reply mate.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-11-2011, 11:44 PM
Robh's Avatar
Robh (Rob)
Registered User

Robh is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Blue Mountains, Australia
Posts: 1,333
I don't find those maximum magnification rules of much use. I think they were designed for smaller apertures, say to 4 inches, as their light dropped significantly with power up to 200x.

For larger apertures (e.g. 8 inch), the seeing will always be the limiting factor. Only on odd occasions will you get a sharp view above 200x.
The higher magnification will in fact exaggerate any jitter due to poor seeing.
And the lower the object is to the horizon, the worse the effect.

Regards, Rob
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-11-2011, 12:13 AM
Cam's Avatar
Cam (Cam)
Registered User

Cam is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Maryborough Vic Australia
Posts: 178
Thanks for the input Rob
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-11-2011, 08:57 AM
Barrykgerdes
Registered User

Barrykgerdes is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Beaumont Hills NSW
Posts: 2,900
Those calculations are theoretical only. The maximum magnification you can use will depend mostly on the seeing conditions. An 8" Dobsonian of the type you are using will go to 200+ magnification when the viewing is perfect as found in some dark locations sometimes.

In the city about 100 x is the best you will do before focus appears blurry.

Barry
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-11-2011, 09:02 AM
koputai's Avatar
koputai (Jason)
Registered User

koputai is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,648
Cam, yes your 4mm is just way too much magnification, but don't swap it for the 5mm, that will be almost as bad.

In my 8" f/6 Dob, I find 8-9mm about the normal limit for giving decent views. There aren't many days per year where you can use less than a 7mm.

Cheers,
Jason.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-11-2011, 06:28 PM
Cam's Avatar
Cam (Cam)
Registered User

Cam is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Maryborough Vic Australia
Posts: 178
Thanks everyone... Im lucky. I live in rural vic so my backyard is a dark sky site
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-11-2011, 06:53 PM
koputai's Avatar
koputai (Jason)
Registered User

koputai is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,648
Better seeing allows more magnification, not darker skies.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement