Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Astrophotography and Imaging Equipment and Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 25-03-2023, 11:27 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 17,903
What is the best camera tilt corrector out there?

I know about the Gerd Neuman camera tilt unit and it seems to be the gold standard. But I occasionally hear of other types out there.

What would you recommend for a camera tilt corrector?

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 26-03-2023, 12:26 AM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,984
I’m currently looking into https://octopi.space/
It’s certainly not cheap but I’m hearing some good reviews due to their compactness.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 26-03-2023, 04:00 PM
Ryderscope's Avatar
Ryderscope (Rodney)
Registered User

Ryderscope is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Glanmire, NSW
Posts: 2,190
Testar have several listed in their web site:

https://www.testar.com.au/collections/tilters
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 26-03-2023, 10:36 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 17,903
The Baader one looks good. It's a bit thinner than the Gerd Neuman one which I mainly hear about. But it still has the side screw adjustments rather than on the face where they are hard to get to.

Also quite a bit cheaper. I have a set of Baader eyepieces and they are very high quality so Baader are a reliable brand for me,

Greg.

Last edited by gregbradley; 27-03-2023 at 09:32 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 27-03-2023, 09:33 AM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 17,903
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atmos View Post
I’m currently looking into https://octopi.space/
It’s certainly not cheap but I’m hearing some good reviews due to their compactness.
Despite them saying their adapter is thin it's quite a bit thicker than the Baader or the Gerd Neuman. 10mm versus 17.5mm.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 30-03-2023, 01:06 AM
Joshua Bunn's Avatar
Joshua Bunn (Joshua)
Registered User

Joshua Bunn is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Albany, Western Australia
Posts: 1,464
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley View Post
Despite them saying their adapter is thin it's quite a bit thicker than the Baader or the Gerd Neuman. 10mm versus 17.5mm.

Greg.

This is true, but is is also a backspacing unit and has lateral displacement adjustment built in, so you save some BF there.

I'm making one of these now for a customer, for a large square camera, which will have tilt, lateral adjustment and backspacing adjustment all independent of each other.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 30-03-2023, 07:49 AM
Tilt's Avatar
Tilt (Michael)
Registered User

Tilt is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 556
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua Bunn View Post
I'm making one of these now for a customer, for a large square camera, which will have tilt, lateral adjustment and backspacing adjustment all independent of each other.
You have my attention with all those independent adjustments. With backspacing, how many mm does this device use?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 30-03-2023, 09:54 AM
JA
.....

JA is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,976
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley View Post
What is the best camera tilt corrector out there?
Hi Greg,

I don't know about best, but I do like the simplicity of the push-pull screw tilt adjusters built in to the front mounting plate of various brand/model cameras, like the ZWO6200 or the like, giving up virtually no further back-focus distance. You'd need a very short or modified Allen key to adjust them in situ though.

Best
JA
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 30-03-2023, 02:51 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 17,903
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua Bunn View Post
This is true, but is is also a backspacing unit and has lateral displacement adjustment built in, so you save some BF there.

I'm making one of these now for a customer, for a large square camera, which will have tilt, lateral adjustment and backspacing adjustment all independent of each other.
That sounds good. What are the details of that?

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 30-03-2023, 02:59 PM
AnakChan (Sean)
Registered User

AnakChan is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Perth
Posts: 373
+1 to Greg's question to Joshua. I'm curious too .

Another is the Photon Cage but that's quite $$$ too.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 31-03-2023, 01:45 AM
Joshua Bunn's Avatar
Joshua Bunn (Joshua)
Registered User

Joshua Bunn is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Albany, Western Australia
Posts: 1,464
For this particular camera, it adds about 10mm of backfocus, +/- 2mm for backfocus adjustment. Its a bit of a big unit for this camera, because its a square camera, round cameras like the ZWO and QHY ones would make the unit smaller and lighter. Its also got +/- 2mm or lateral movement if your chip is not centered on the optical axis.


Its also not the lightest thing, as there are 4 main components to it, but future versions and ones for round cameras can be lighter.


Cheers
Josh
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-04-2023, 04:48 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 17,903
It still sounds good.
Greg
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement