Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 08-04-2018, 06:42 PM
AstroBogan's Avatar
AstroBogan (Jacob)
Jacob

AstroBogan is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Sydney
Posts: 175
Southern Pinwheel Galaxy (Help)

So i decided to try again with another galaxy and managed to snap 40~ lights 45 sec subs @ 800 ISO, 15 darks and 20 flats.

Taken with a SW ED80, HEQ5 unguided and unmodded cannon EOS 60D in my light polluted backyard.

I'm not sure if it is due to light pollution or my camera in general, but no matter what I do with my processing, I cannot get the image to look clear. (see raw stacked image and then the cropped processed image).

Any advice?
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Southern Pinwheel Final.jpg)
189.6 KB88 views
Click for full-size image (Southern Pinwheel Final raw stacked.jpg)
156.7 KB62 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-04-2018, 09:56 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
Jacob, I wouldn't bother with flats at this stage, you won't see any
difference in the end result.
The background is quite a lot too light, which washes out the galaxy.
If you darken it, it will make the galaxy pop, and beneficially, will hide
some of the noise. More subs will help to reduce the noise also.
Your image is lacking colour; this galaxy should be distinctly blue.
An LP filter might help if you are badly affected where you are. You
will probably just have to attend to the colour cast it introduces.
I have attached an image showing how 83 should look using shortish
subs like yours,[but using JPEGS]. My background is actually a smidge too dark.
raymo
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (M83-x-48-TIFF-ex-PS-down.jpg)
60.2 KB51 views

Last edited by raymo; 08-04-2018 at 09:58 PM. Reason: missing bracket
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-04-2018, 10:04 PM
AstroBogan's Avatar
AstroBogan (Jacob)
Jacob

AstroBogan is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Sydney
Posts: 175
Quote:
Originally Posted by raymo View Post
Jacob, I wouldn't bother with flats at this stage, you won't see any
difference in the end result.
The background is quite a lot too light, which washes out the galaxy.
If you darken it, it will make the galaxy pop, and beneficially, will hide
some of the noise. More subs will help to reduce the noise also.
Your image is lacking colour; this galaxy should be distinctly blue.
An LP filter might help if you are badly affected where you are. You
will probably just have to attend to the colour cast it introduces.
I have attached an image showing how 83 should look using shortish
subs like yours,[but using JPEGS]. My background is actually a smidge too dark.
raymo
Thanks for the info Raymo, any advice on which LP filter to go with? I have no experience with any of that. But yes, I am unfortunately dealing with a lot of light pollution (30 mins from Sydney CBD) which has a terrible glow in every direction it seems like. i'll try for more subs next time, and hopefully my processing gets better!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-04-2018, 10:35 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
I don't have much experience of LP filters, having lived mostly in small towns. You'll have to see if someone else offers help.
raymo
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-04-2018, 11:29 AM
sil's Avatar
sil (Steve)
Not even a speck of dust

sil is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,474
I'm a nikon guy myself but i know there are a bunch of inbody-drop in filters available for canon. I think there are ones suitable for modified or unmodified cameras, so read up on the details. Remember a filter blocks some light so expect to need to increase exposure time and/or stretch further in processing, but with a filter you are gathering more usable signal and dont need to remove as much colour cast later on in processing. Highly worthwhile getting one. If you have a choice of brands I'd be inclined to research but likely go with the expensive option, not just the cheapest i find on ebay. A poor quality (cheap) filter may be removing more than just light pollution and/or introducing chromatic problems. With optics the extra cost for quality is worthwhile.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement