Quote:
Originally Posted by alistairsam
Hi,
undoubtedly due to quality of mirror, eye piece, aperture and dark site. but I wonder what makes the most difference.
mirror reflectivity, quality, eyepiece, dark site?
edit: i find calsky.com an invaluable tool in planning an observing session
|
Hi,
A Dark site is more important than all of the other things you mention added together. They all individually add small increments of improvement but by far the most critical is a dark sky. By dark, I don't mean 50km out of Melbourne either. That's 1/2 dark
When you do get to a dark sky, all of those other factors you mention will have a more noticeable effect also. Like a good mirror and good eyepieces.
As Malcolm also mentioned it takes time to develop your observing skills. Under identical conditions with identical equipment, an experienced observer will see more than an inexperienced observer. You need to remember these are very dim targets. Not like a colour photograph. Spend time on each target (10 minutes plus, for starters). Look for contrast changes or slight changes in brightness across different parts of the target. You will then "start" to make out some of the structure which is easily visible in photographs. However, you are wasting your time from suburban or urban skies. If you want to observe from home that is fine, but tailor your target choice to suit the conditions. ie pick bright targets like moon, planets, double or variable stars. These target types are much brigher and not so diffuse and are easily observed from light polluted skies.
Cheers
John B