Thanks for your comments.
Quote:
Originally Posted by erick
I bet that was an exciting couple of minutes. I remember the rush just trying to grab some short widefield exposures knowing that, if you blinked or sneezed, you lost vital time that couldn't be recovered.
They look like pretty good and detailed shots to me, Mike. I take it that different passes give different orientations? Does it maintain the same orientation relative to the Earth all the time? (Sorry - I could look that up myself).
Now, next is HST?? 
|
Good question Eric, I wondered the same thing myself. But looking at other people's images of the
ISS, I'm guessing it rotates and rolls around quite a bit, giving different orientations each pass.
I've considered giving the HST a go, but every time I look at the upcoming passes, they're never higher than 10deg above the horizon.
Quote:
Originally Posted by edwardsdj
Hi Mike,
Awesome ISS images
I quite like the widefield shot too.
I'm so keen to try this myself one day. I'm sure it's really difficult to get the target on the chip of the ToUcam using the finder though. To get 100 frames containing the ISS sounds like a really good result to me.
Have fun,
Doug
|
It sure is. I've only tried this 4 times - the first time I got an overexposed blob, the second time I got a whole avi of black frames with not a single hit recorded, and the third and fourth times are the results above.
It's essential to get the finderscope as accurately aligned as possible, get the focus spot on, and make a rough guess at the exposure. I usually put the 12" newt on my EQ mount to get focus right (so the star doesn't move) and rough adjustment on the finderscope, then move it to the dob base to align the finderscope again. I've found that looking through the finderscope even on a slightly different angle can mean hitting or missing the
ISS in the FOV.
I guess at the exposure, starting at around 1/1200s for a bright overhead pass. I'm guessing it would need to be a bit less for dimmer passes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tornado33
Very nice work there. The 2nd one has heaps of detail I bet it was hard keeping the ISS "still" in the scope and camera.
Theres a very good flyover on the morning of 4th Feb for Newcastle according to http://www.heavens-above.com at 5.25 am AEST
Scott
|
Thanks Scott.
For processing, I go through the avi in virtual dub, deleting the blank or blurry frames. When all that's left is frames with bits of the
ISS in them, I save them as bitmaps. I then use ninox/ppmcentre to centre the
ISS in the frame and crop the frame to something like 400x400.
I then hand-select the sharpest, best frames and layer (stack) them in photoshop, then save as tiff, take into registax for slight wavelet sharpening.
For the second shot above, I was lucky enough to capture a few frames where the
ISS went behind a tree - this reduced the exposure and the overexposed areas (eg: the radiator on the right) came out at about the right exposure. So I processed them independantly, and used a layer mask to combine it with the overexposed one.
I've been waiting for this upcoming pass for a few weeks (last one was clouded out), but it looks like this one will be too

along with the venus/jupiter conjunction
Thanks again for your comments.