Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 20-09-2009, 09:14 AM
kinetic's Avatar
kinetic (Steve)
ATMer and Saganist

kinetic is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Adelaide S.A.
Posts: 2,293
NGC 346 in SMC LLRGB repro

I have a few nights of data now , unfortunately all with
some sort of flaw.
The Luminosity from the 19th last night was super crisp BUT
on processing I get a flare on every star at 7 o'clock
(I think this is just the camera/filterwheel offaxis slightly)

On the RGB from the 17th I have not enough frames for good
S/N and the seeing was not as good as the 19th.

But I tried a basic LLRGB blend as per the Gendler website and
got this.

Colour is obviously wrong...I think this should be a bluish reflection
neb
type colour so the saturated pink is a bit offputting.
My previous attempt got the blue result but way oversaturated.

This is through stock standard Meade DSI red/green/blue filters
and a Baader IR for the luminosity.

Steve
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (LLRGB_blend_as_pergendler_website_rotated.jpg)
184.5 KB56 views
Click for full-size image (lum_19th_curve_rotate.jpg)
192.5 KB36 views

Last edited by kinetic; 20-09-2009 at 09:29 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 20-09-2009, 09:40 AM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
Nice shot Steve....what were the lengths of the subs you shot through each filter??.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 20-09-2009, 09:48 AM
kinetic's Avatar
kinetic (Steve)
ATMer and Saganist

kinetic is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Adelaide S.A.
Posts: 2,293
All 5 sec Carl.....

Steve
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 20-09-2009, 11:16 AM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by kinetic View Post
All 5 sec Carl.....

Steve
The DSI's mono chip is more sensitive to the red end of the spectrum I believe, so you may have to increase the length of the subs for blue light to get better blue response.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-10-2009, 12:46 AM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
Steve,

Great effort.

The elongation isn't as noticeable in the LLRGB as it is in the L frame.

Regards,
Humayun
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-10-2009, 09:41 AM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Interesting nebula this one. I shot it some time ago. I woinder about your camera being square to the optical path though. At the bottom of the image the stars are round (near perfect) and at the top they are elongated. What focusor are you using? The trouble with all these focusors is that they flex at different times. Even the feather touch I have flexes just a little and that is all that is needed to get elongated stars in one part of the image.

Overall, I like the shot Steve. I think somewhere in between both for colouring. I think there is a strong hint of Ha in part of this nebula.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-10-2009, 11:18 PM
kinetic's Avatar
kinetic (Steve)
ATMer and Saganist

kinetic is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Adelaide S.A.
Posts: 2,293
Quote:
Originally Posted by Octane View Post
Steve,

Great effort.

The elongation isn't as noticeable in the LLRGB as it is in the L frame.

Regards,
Humayun
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Haese View Post
I wonder about your camera being square to the optical path though. At the bottom of the image the stars are round (near perfect) and at the top they are elongated. What focusor are you using?
Overall, I like the shot Steve. I think somewhere in between both for colouring. I think there is a strong hint of Ha in part of this nebula.
Thanks Paul and Humayun for the kind words.
Paul it's a stock standard GSO 10:1 and I think you may be right
about the flexure.
Only thing is, I think in this case it may have been caused by some
of the later frames being rotated slightly by me bumping the DSI
somehow or it just moving by it's cord fouling on the GEM.
The reason I say this is because several re-align attempts using the
stack work better when I do a align with rotate instead of
just pure align.

Steve
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 13-10-2009, 09:41 AM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
That could be it too I suppose.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement