Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 01-11-2012, 04:07 AM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
Jupiter 1st Nov 2012

Seeing looked ok naked eye but nope, didn't really get there.

C11/DBK618
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (1st nov jupiter0010_g4_b3_ap96FINAL.png)
53.7 KB141 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-11-2012, 06:35 AM
nandopg's Avatar
nandopg
Registered User

nandopg is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Santa Rita do Sapucai - Brazil
Posts: 303
Hi Asi,
Great image despite the seeing. It is possible to see the albedo of the moon in the FOV. The EZ also shows lots of great details.

Thanks for posting,

Fernando
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-11-2012, 06:44 AM
Larryp's Avatar
Larryp (Laurie)
Registered User

Larryp is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,244
Nice Image!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-11-2012, 08:28 AM
lepton3's Avatar
lepton3 (Ivan)
Registered User

lepton3 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 670
Nice view Asimov, a fair bit of detail showing. Even this "boring" side is pretty interesting.

As Fernando pointed out, possibly even some detail on Ganymede? May be worth a separate stack.

-Ivan
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-11-2012, 10:49 AM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
Hi Fernando & thanks!

Cheers Laurie.

Thanks Ivan. Yes detail on Ganymede. I'm still getting used to that scenario even with average seeing. This is already a combo stack. Only a 1500 frame moon stack so this is about as far as I can tweek it without introducing artefacts.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-11-2012, 11:02 AM
Poita (Peter)
Registered User

Poita is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NSW Country
Posts: 3,586
Nice work from the C11, do you reckon going bigger would make much difference or are you seeing limited even now?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-11-2012, 11:11 AM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
Hi Peter & thanks. Well I've still got the 14" newt but no, I'm getting a better result with this extraordinary C11 that I still reckon has an uncannily great set of optics in her..The seeing is still the limiting factor for me. Nothing special about this seeing & I wouldn't give it any more than a 5-6.The interesting thing is though, it's the first time this year I've seen the high & mid levels 'join forces'. When all 3 are lined up on the same heading, that's when I'll get my seeing.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-11-2012, 01:35 PM
Saturn%5's Avatar
Saturn%5 (Graeme)
Registered User

Saturn%5 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Launceston
Posts: 758
As always even when not great seeing, a great effort.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-11-2012, 07:11 PM
Shiraz's Avatar
Shiraz (Ray)
Registered User

Shiraz is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: ardrossan south australia
Posts: 4,918
Really nice image Asi. regards Ray
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-11-2012, 07:54 PM
Matt Wastell's Avatar
Matt Wastell (Matt)
Look up, look good!

Matt Wastell is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 2,762
Super image - great detail and colour!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-11-2012, 09:26 PM
Sebbie's Avatar
Sebbie (Sebastian)
Sebbie

Sebbie is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 260
Great picture. May I ask what barlow you are using?

- Seb
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-11-2012, 10:44 PM
Troy's Avatar
Troy
Registered User

Troy is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Hunter Valley
Posts: 946
Good image John, at least your still posting something for us to look at 8-)
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-11-2012, 08:09 AM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
Thanks guys.

This one Seb. > http://www.meade.com/catalog/meade_4...es_4000_03.htm
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-11-2012, 10:48 AM
Quark's Avatar
Quark (Trevor)
Registered User

Quark is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Broken Hill NSW Australia
Posts: 4,110
Nice result Asi, reckon for this apparition, anytime those tiny white ovals are resolved in the STeB its been a pretty useful session.

Regards
Trevor
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-11-2012, 11:53 AM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
Thanks Trevor. lowering the gamma to 50% on the live feed has always been my bench mark. If you're seeing details right to the poles with this gamma setting you're going to do ok. Naturally I bring back the gamma to 100 before any AVI is taken.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-11-2012, 06:53 PM
oernulfs (Ørnulf)
Registered User

oernulfs is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Norway
Posts: 142
Very nice.

What kind of camera are you using? And what kind of exposure times, gain and gamma have you appplied?
In my short experience (usink dbk21 color) I have used gamma around 50 both when viewing on screen AND recording. Should gamma be set higher than 50 (you mention 100)? Or is that dependent on the camera...

Ørnulf
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-11-2012, 09:45 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
Quote:
Originally Posted by oernulfs View Post
Very nice.

What kind of camera are you using? And what kind of exposure times, gain and gamma have you appplied?
In my short experience (usink dbk21 color) I have used gamma around 50 both when viewing on screen AND recording. Should gamma be set higher than 50 (you mention 100)? Or is that dependent on the camera...

Ørnulf
I'm using the Imaging Source DBK618. My exposure times directly relate to what frame rate I use, but before I choose a frame rate, I must consider the seeing, so it does depend a lot on the seeing. Generally for good seeing I would use 30FPS with an exposure of 1/30th-1/38th With roughly a 75% filled histogram with my C11/2X barlow (F20) For 60 FPS (which I use for average-poor seeing I'd be running my fastest exposure with maxed out gain.

I always use 100% gamma which is default or linear. I have experimented with lower gamma but was not happy with the results.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-11-2012, 04:19 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
One more, this time at F30 - Had to try it. I've had worse results but in better seeing I hope to receive a better result. Going to be clouded out for a couple of days I think. Not happy!
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (1st nov jupiter0008_g4_b3_ap57F30FINAL.jpg)
98.4 KB25 views
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-11-2012, 08:17 AM
prokyon's Avatar
prokyon (Werner Probst)
Metalhead

prokyon is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Austria/Europe
Posts: 728
Stunning image! I had a long time of abstinence here, but I remember the name asimov . Great planet pics as usual !!!
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-11-2012, 03:47 AM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
And I remember you too Prokyon..

Thank you!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 01:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement