Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Software and Computers
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 01-05-2006, 10:26 AM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
Image scale - Where do you put your barlow.

It's been discussed in a couple of threads here over time, but I thought I'd resurrect the advice with a couple of images for example.

If you don't use diagonal when imaging then this won't apply, but if you still like to use one then consider putting your barlow before the diagonal. You will get a considerable increase in image scale. As I don't have a powermate to try I can't say whether the same applies for them, though I can't see why it wouldn't.

The following two images are taken with a meade 8"sct in poor conditions. The first is with a 2X Celestron Omni barlow (achro) after the diagonal and the second is before the diagonal.

Both images have only had a rough run through Registax with no scale adjustment.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (jup-27-4-06-1st_0016-22.03.jpg)
10.4 KB24 views
Click for full-size image (jup-27-4-06-1st_0019.jpg)
9.3 KB23 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-05-2006, 11:32 AM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,378
yes the image scale is increased, but at the loss of brightness? Does processing help that factor out?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-05-2006, 11:40 AM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
I didn't adjust any of the settings h0ughy, just swapped the barlow around. You are going to get a loss of brightness no matter what method you use to increase scale. All that would be needed is an adjustment of gain/gamma.

I learnt something else the other day to (the hard way of course. Is there any other way ) Normally I have my laptop screen pretty bright when I'm planetary imaging at home alone, but the other night out at Ron's I had it turned right down. This had a direct affect on my ability to judge gamma, gain, brightness, saturation etc in relation to my exposure and frame rate. Consequently when I processed them at home the results were not as I expected. Most ended up with some onion rings from being underexposed.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-05-2006, 12:59 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
Yes, I tried this only the other night. Took a shot with the SCT with only the 2X barlow & toucam then added the diagonal on top of the barlow & took another.

Turns a 2X barlow into a 3X or so they tell me.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-05-2006, 01:21 PM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
looks to be that way asi
insteresting how the barlow placement changes things likethat, but when you consider that the EP/webcam is further away from teh balow it makes sense (yeah i know, stating the obvious!)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-05-2006, 02:53 PM
davidpretorius's Avatar
davidpretorius
lots of eyes on you!

davidpretorius is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 7,381
k3ccd is good with that meter and trying to get to 200 - 250.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement