Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 24-08-2012, 02:25 AM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
EQ mount legs- which be more gooderer?

I'm soon to purchase a new EQ5 something mount or similar, and I see all these different leg choices. Wood, aluminium, steel, pier etc.

I gather aluminium is not as good a choice as stainless steel for stability? What about vibration? How do pier mounts compare to steel tripods?

I don't want anything too heavy, or expensive, yet at the same time want something stable.

Now I already have a Samson pier mount. It seems quite solid. Are any of the popular Skywatcher EQ heads or whatever they are called compatible?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 24-08-2012, 08:29 AM
Barrykgerdes
Registered User

Barrykgerdes is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Beaumont Hills NSW
Posts: 2,900
Quote:
Originally Posted by cometcatcher View Post
I'm soon to purchase a new EQ5 something mount or similar, and I see all these different leg choices. Wood, aluminium, steel, pier etc.

I gather aluminium is not as good a choice as stainless steel for stability? What about vibration? How do pier mounts compare to steel tripods?

I don't want anything too heavy, or expensive, yet at the same time want something stable.

Now I already have a Sampson pier mount. It seems quite solid. Are any of the popular Skywatcher EQ heads or whatever they are called compatible?
The mounts will come with legs if bought new. EQ5 , EQ6, G11 etc come with stainless? steel legs and are quite stable on a solid surface.

If your Sampson pier is a permanent device you can adapt most EQ heads to it. However if it is only the standard Sampson pier I think the new tripod legs will be better.

Barry

Last edited by Barrykgerdes; 24-08-2012 at 10:45 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 24-08-2012, 10:37 AM
Waxing_Gibbous's Avatar
Waxing_Gibbous (Peter)
Grumpy Old Man-Child

Waxing_Gibbous is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South Gippsland
Posts: 1,768
I swapped my EQ6 legs for a portable pier, purely for convenience (much less tripping over).
The pier is very stable though not quite as planted as the stock tripod legs.
I weight the feet of the pier with a 75kg chain to ensure ultimate stability, but it's very windy here, so calmer climes would probably need much less, if any.

On the whole I think nice heay steel makes the best tripods.
The heavier the better - forget CF or lightweight Aluminium.
Because of their weight steel 'pods tend to take up less room than an equally specced wooden or Al model, though wood dampens ground-up vibrations a little better than either.
But unless you live close to a major road or a siesmic fault, it tends not to be an issue (actually we've had 3 earthquakes in the last year but they were all on cloudy nights - so no problem ).

FWIW, I think the stock Skywatcher 'pods a very effective and I never had an issue with one.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 24-08-2012, 10:58 AM
Larryp's Avatar
Larryp (Laurie)
Registered User

Larryp is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,244
The stainless steel tripod is by far the best tripod
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 24-08-2012, 12:04 PM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
Looks like stainless steel is the way to go then.

Thanks very much for the helpful advice.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement