Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 22-08-2012, 11:02 PM
pvelez's Avatar
pvelez (Pete)
Registered User

pvelez is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,250
NGC 6744 - in progress

I've decided to try my hand at something a bit fainter - so here is a crop of NGC 6744. Its a work in progress - I think I need twice as much data. And that annoying blue gradient is still there - I can beat it down with more signal I guess.

Not sure of precise integration times - roughly 2 hours L and 1 each of RGB

Taken with QSI 583wsg on RC8 and processed in PI

Comments and criticisms welcome

Thanks for looking

Pete
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (NGC 6744.jpg)
170.1 KB79 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 22-08-2012, 11:16 PM
allan gould's Avatar
allan gould
Registered User

allan gould is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 4,485
It's a difficult galaxy to image and needs a lot of data from a dark site. Try the QSI at 2x2 binning for all filters for your next image
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 23-08-2012, 07:55 AM
pvelez's Avatar
pvelez (Pete)
Registered User

pvelez is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,250
Quote:
Originally Posted by allan gould View Post
It's a difficult galaxy to image and needs a lot of data from a dark site. Try the QSI at 2x2 binning for all filters for your next image
Yes Allan, I think I picked a challenging target.

Sadly, this is binned x2. My site very not dark - I'm about 7km from the CBD so its LP city.

I do think I've not drawn enough out of the L - I'll have a more serious play with it this evening.

Pete
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 24-08-2012, 07:00 PM
tilbrook@rbe.ne's Avatar
tilbrook@rbe.ne (Justin Tilbrook)
JHT

tilbrook@rbe.ne is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Penwortham
Posts: 3,039
Hi Pete,

You really did pcik a challenging target!
I have dark skies, and had trouble getting decent data.
You have pulled a fair bit of detail so far.

Cheers,

Justin.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 24-08-2012, 08:00 PM
whzzz28's Avatar
whzzz28 (Nathan)
Registered User

whzzz28 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 348
You wouldn't expect it to be so hard as a mag 9.0 galaxy, but for some reason it is.

What exposure lengths are you using?

I got a bit of data on 6744 at Astrofest but not too much and found i had trouble getting detail with 10min subs.
Right now i am imaging it from home with 15min subs and it's still a bit dull (waiting for NGC253 to come up).
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 24-08-2012, 08:01 PM
pvelez's Avatar
pvelez (Pete)
Registered User

pvelez is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,250
Quote:
Originally Posted by tilbrook@rbe.ne View Post
Hi Pete,

You really did pcik a challenging target!
I have dark skies, and had trouble getting decent data.
You have pulled a fair bit of detail so far.

Cheers,

Justin.
Thanks Justin

its a challenge - more a processing challenge. I find I am too impatient usually and want to move onto something new each session. I've just started to use CCD Autopilot and PI so its a chance to let the computer manage the imaging while I have dinner, remind the family what I look like etc and then try and drag a decent image out of the data.

Its plugging away again this evening. Tonight I plan to wait till NGC 253 is up, set the computer to do its work and go to bed - a first for me

Will let you know how it goes

Pete
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 26-08-2012, 10:45 PM
madbadgalaxyman's Avatar
madbadgalaxyman (Robert)
Registered User

madbadgalaxyman is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 936
Quote:
Originally Posted by whzzz28 View Post
You wouldn't expect it to be so hard as a mag 9.0 galaxy, but for some reason it is.
Agreed, Nathan, 9th magnitude sounds bright.....
but just giving the total brightness of a galaxy says nothing about the actual angular size of the object in the sky. The long axis of this galaxy is at least 25 arcminutes; it is nearly half a degree across!!
So while NGC 6744 might be as bright as a 9th magn. star, it is like a 9th magnitude star spread over a vast area of sky......

cheers,
Robert

Last edited by madbadgalaxyman; 26-08-2012 at 10:47 PM. Reason: typo
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 27-08-2012, 08:17 AM
pvelez's Avatar
pvelez (Pete)
Registered User

pvelez is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,250
Quote:
Originally Posted by whzzz28 View Post
You wouldn't expect it to be so hard as a mag 9.0 galaxy, but for some reason it is.

What exposure lengths are you using?

I got a bit of data on 6744 at Astrofest but not too much and found i had trouble getting detail with 10min subs.
Right now i am imaging it from home with 15min subs and it's still a bit dull (waiting for NGC253 to come up).

Nathan,

with the LP at my place its 180 seconds on R and G, 288s on B and 300 on L.

Way too short unless I just plug away at it for hours.

For some reason, the more data I add, the harder it is to process. I guess I need to keep at it.

I also switched over to NGC 253 - its far easier!

Pete
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 28-08-2012, 06:01 AM
Ross G
Registered User

Ross G is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cherrybrook, NSW
Posts: 5,013
Hi Pete,

A great attempt, especially from light polluted Sydney.

I have tried imaging it from Coonabarabran and not gotten any more detail than you have.

What suburb are you imaging from?

Ross.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 28-08-2012, 08:03 AM
pvelez's Avatar
pvelez (Pete)
Registered User

pvelez is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,250
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ross G View Post
Hi Pete,

A great attempt, especially from light polluted Sydney.

I have tried imaging it from Coonabarabran and not gotten any more detail than you have.

What suburb are you imaging from?

Ross.
Ross

I'm in Haberfield - only 7km from the CBD. Its pretty heavy duty LP but with lots fo shorter subs, I can make sopme inroads on these sorts of targets

Pete
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement