Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 5.00 average.
  #1  
Old 24-04-2012, 06:47 PM
icytailmark (Mark)
Registered User

icytailmark is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: sydney australia
Posts: 832
Lunt 60mm or Solarmax 60mm?

im looking at buying a solar scope for imaging and mostly viewing. Id like to get it before the venus transit. My budget is $3000. Which is better the lunt or the solarmax? opps sorry i put in wrong section
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 24-04-2012, 07:37 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
As a Coronado owner I would be inclined to go with Lunt but If you take a look around my solar mosaics section this is what you can get with a Coronado.

Check it out here
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 24-04-2012, 07:42 PM
icytailmark (Mark)
Registered User

icytailmark is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: sydney australia
Posts: 832
paul does the sun look like that in the telescope or is it a different colour thru eyepiece?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 24-04-2012, 08:29 PM
MikeyB's Avatar
MikeyB (Michael)
Registered User

MikeyB is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Perth, WA
Posts: 760
Photographic colours through solar scopes are always added manually in processing, but Paul's are reasonably close to what you'll see through a Coronado or a Lunt (I've owned both).

Note that the many solar features shown in Paul's photos are only as clearly visible through a double-stacked filter configuration. Single Ha filters aren't capable of quite as much visual contrast, although there's still plenty to see. The Venus transit will be clearly visible through a single filter configuration scope.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 24-04-2012, 09:37 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Mark, Michael has pretty much covered your questions. I just want to add that I try to reproduce what I see visually in with colouring my images. So yes the colour is pretty close.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 27-04-2012, 01:12 PM
Matt Wastell's Avatar
Matt Wastell (Matt)
Look up, look good!

Matt Wastell is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 2,762
Hi Mark
I would recommend the Lunt scope - IMHO they are finished better and are easier to use.
The view through the eyepiece is quite red but still awesome!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 27-04-2012, 02:18 PM
icytailmark (Mark)
Registered User

icytailmark is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: sydney australia
Posts: 832
The feather touch focuser for the Lunt scope is that a must have for imaging?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 27-04-2012, 04:33 PM
casstony
Registered User

casstony is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Warragul, Vic
Posts: 4,494
The pressure tuned option is more desirable than the FT focuser imo. You're less likely to have sweet spot issues because the etalon is perpendicular to the incoming light and double stacking later on is much easier with the pressure tuned model.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 27-04-2012, 06:25 PM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,484
Easy. Pressure tuned Lunt. But get the Feather Touch focusser. If you can stretch it, go the 80mm...best bang for buck by far.

Far more precise in central band selection and you can go from red to blue H-alpha wings.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 27-04-2012, 08:03 PM
AndrewJ
Watch me post!

AndrewJ is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,905
Quote:
Easy. Pressure tuned Lunt. But get the Feather Touch focusser. If you can stretch it, go the 80mm...best bang for buck by far.
Gotta agree
The pressure tuned 80mm gives absolutely stunning views,
with very even resolution/focus across the total FOV.
The FT focusser just makes focusing a non issue,
smooth as butter.

Andrew
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 28-04-2012, 11:15 AM
alocky's Avatar
alocky (Andrew lockwood)
PI popular people's front

alocky is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: perth australia
Posts: 1,291
I've got the lunt 80 without the feather touch; it focuses fine and I've taken plenty of sharply focused video through it. The whole experience might be more pleasurable with the FT, as they are Nice Things to Have, but certainly not essential. When and if I upgrade to a double stack (not necessary so far, especially for imaging) I might add the FT, but only because everyone bangs on about how important it is, but a year and a half in, I'm still happy with it as is.
Agree with the comments about 80mm being best bang for buck, and certainly have heard plenty of people frustrated with the tilt tuning sweet spot for imaging - go the pressure tuner type.
cheers,
Andrew.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-05-2012, 04:01 PM
Shark
Registered User

Shark is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 11
alocky where did u buy from?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-05-2012, 04:27 PM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,927
Mark,
I use a single and double stacked SM60 (front etalon(s)) on an ED80.
No problems with the T max tuning, and I can easily re-tune from the red to the blue side of Ha to chase the Doppler effects.
They have worked very well for me over the past four years...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement