Quote:
Originally Posted by Starcrazzy
Hi,
Very interesting...I hope you don't mind but i sved your image and inverted it in photoshop...you can make out the detail alittle better...i am deffinatly no expert but it doesn't appear to be a diffraction spike as it gets wider the further from the star it gets although it is at the same angle as the other spikes in the shot...i think its just interesting nebulous material..it can't be a nutron star as you know as its still glowing..
exellent pic by the way...can you give me some details as to your methods...exposures etc..
cheers
|
Hi Starcrazzy,
No I don't mind at all, the inverted image certainly highlights the "object".
Yeah I agree it's probably nothing of consequence - it stood out when I was examining the high resolution version of the image.
The image was done with my 12-inch f/5 GSO dobsonian telescope which is retro-mounted on an old Australian made Samson german equatorial mount. I guide the telescope manually using my 4.5-inch f/18 guidescope and control the main RA drive with a hand held controller (faster and slower buttons). The DEC adjustments are done by hand - since the DEC is not motorised. There's a pic of my setup here
http://www.skylab.com.au/pmsa/
With my Canon 300D I have been using ISO200 rather than the faster ISO settings, since ISO200 gives me the best possible result from the camera - smoother images and lower noise. I use IRIS to do image stacking, dark frame subtraction, bias and flat-fielding of the image.
I then normally do final adjustments in Photoshop, and sometimes use Noiseware CE to do further smoothing of the image.
These images of ETA C
were 6 x 120 second (12-minutes total) exposure @ ISO200 with dark and bias frames removed and flat-fielded.
Thanks for your comments
Paul Mayo