Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 18-11-2011, 07:28 PM
SkyViking's Avatar
SkyViking (Rolf)
Registered User

SkyViking is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waitakere Ranges, New Zealand
Posts: 2,260
The protoplanetary disc of Beta Pictoris

Hi Everyone,

I remember as a young boy being particularly fascinated by one picture in an astronomy book I had. It was the 1984 image of the dust disc around Beta Pictoris.
This protoplanetary disc of debris and dust is orbiting the star Beta Pictoris 63.4 light years away. This is a very young system thought to be only around 12 million years old and is essentially similar to how our own Solar System must have formed some 4.5 billion years ago. The disc is seen edge-on from our perspective and appears in professional images as thin wedges or lines protruding radially from the central star in opposite directions.

For the last couple of years I have been wondering if it was possible for amateurs to capture this special target but have never come across any such images
The main difficulty is the overwhelming glare from Beta Pictoris itself which completely drowns out the dust disc that is circling very close to the star. Images of the disc taken by the Hubble Space Telescope, and from big observatories, are usually made by physically blocking out the glare of Beta Pictoris itself within the optical path. But recently I then found this 1993 paper 'Observation of the central part of the beta Pictoris disk with an anti-blooming CCD' (Lecavelier des etangs, A., Perrin, G., Ferlet, R., Vidal-Madjar, A., Colas, F., et al., 1993, A&A, 274, 877)
Full article available here: http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993A%26A...274..877L

I then realised that it might not be entirely impossible to also record this object with my own equipment. So now that Beta Pictoris has risen to a favorable position in this year's evening sky I decided to have a go at it the other day
I followed the technique described in the paper above, which basically consists of imaging Beta and then taking another image of a similar reference star under the same conditions. The two images are subtracted from each other to eliminate the stellar glare, and the dust disc should then hopefully reveal itself.

First I collected 55 images of Beta Pictoris at 30 seconds each. The dust disc is most prominent in IR so ideally a better result would be expected with the use of an IR pass filter. Since I only have a traditional IR/UV block filter I just imaged without any filter, to at least get as much IR light through as possible.

Next step was to capture a similar image of a reference star under the same conditions. For this purpose I used Alpha Pictoris as the paper suggested. This star is of nearly the same spectral type (A7IV compared to Beta's A6V) and is also close enough to Beta in the sky so that the change in telescope orientation should not affect the diffaction pattern. However, since the two stars have different magnitudes I needed to calculate how long to expose Alpha for in order to get a similar image which I could subtract from the Beta image. Some quick math:

The magnitude difference between the stars is 3.86(Beta) - 3.30(Alpha) = 0.56
Due to the logarithmic nature of the magnitude scale we know that a difference of 1 magnitude equals a brightness ratio of 2.512. Therefore 2.512 to the power of the numerical magnitude difference then equals the variation in brightness.
2.512^0.56 = 1.67, so it appears Alpha is 1.67 times brighter than Beta. This means that exposure for Alpha should be 1/1.67 = 0.597x that of Beta. I took the liberty of using 0.6x for simplicity's sake...
So I collected 55 images of 18 seconds (30 x 0.6) for Alpha.

Both sets of images were stacked separately in Registax and I then imported these into Photoshop, layered Alpha in 'Difference' mode on top of Beta and flattened the result. This produces a very dark image (which it should!) apart from the different background stars. But after some curves adjustment I was able to see clear signs of the actual dust disc protruding on both sides from the glare of the star. I was very happy to conclude that the position angle with regards to the background stars matched the official images exactly.
This raw Difference image looked rather horrible though, so to produce a more natural looking result I took the original stacked Beta image and then blended in the central parts from the Difference image that showed the dust disc. I decided to also keep the black spot of the central glare from the Difference image since the contrast with the protruding disc seems better this way.

And the result is, I believe, the first amateur image of another solar system: The protoplanetary disc around Beta Pictoris. I must say it feels really special to have actually captured this.

The actual image is here: http://www.pbase.com/rolfolsen/image/139722640/original
(In the image the dashed line indicates the true disc plane)

Image details:
55 x 30s
10" Serrurier truss Newtonian
ToUCam Pro SC1
Prime focus, no filters


I'm sure this can be done much better with a higher quality camera, but at least here it is. And I'm personally extremely happy and proud of having achieved this

Hope you enjoy the view as much as I did! All comments and critique is of course welcome.

Regards,
Rolf
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Beta Pictoris presentation 16112011.jpg)
109.9 KB592 views

Last edited by SkyViking; 18-11-2011 at 07:48 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 18-11-2011, 07:34 PM
DavidU's Avatar
DavidU (Dave)
Like to learn

DavidU is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: melbourne
Posts: 4,835
Amazing Rolf ! Love your dedication.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 18-11-2011, 08:13 PM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
Superb imaging.

Love your work, Rolf.

H
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 18-11-2011, 08:16 PM
Miaplacidus's Avatar
Miaplacidus (Brian)
He used to cut the grass.

Miaplacidus is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hobart
Posts: 1,235
And that, Rolf, deserves to go straight to the pool room at JPL!

Sincere congratulations. Brilliant effort, brilliant execution. (And very nicely presented.)

You deserve ten of these...



and a couple of these...



Well done.

Regards,

Brian.

I eagerly await its appearance on APOD!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 18-11-2011, 08:41 PM
ballaratdragons's Avatar
ballaratdragons (Ken)
The 'DRAGON MAN'

ballaratdragons is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
and all that with just a trusty old ToUcam

Congratulations Rolf from an old ToUcam DSO imager
Your results always stun me.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 18-11-2011, 08:51 PM
bartman's Avatar
bartman (Bart)
1 of 7 of 9

bartman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Perth
Posts: 1,968
Well done Rolf !!!!
Truly amazing!
Bartman
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 18-11-2011, 09:25 PM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Wow! Very cool, Rolf.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 18-11-2011, 10:25 PM
atalas's Avatar
atalas
Registered User

atalas is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,144
Congrats and great work.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 18-11-2011, 11:57 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,044
Brilliant Rolf!

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 19-11-2011, 12:08 AM
astroron's Avatar
astroron (Ron)
Supernova Searcher

astroron is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cambroon Queensland Australia
Posts: 9,322
Shows great dedication to your craft Rolf
Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 19-11-2011, 07:58 AM
Ric's Avatar
Ric
Support your local RFS

Ric is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wamboin NSW
Posts: 12,405
Wonderful work Rolf.

An amazing image and I'm sure a first on IIS.

Your an inspiration to all astrophotographers looking for something different to image.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 19-11-2011, 09:24 AM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,741
Hi Rolf

Well, well, well, you certainly do take the path less trodden; another gem so well executed and presented.

Thanks for bringing these esoteric subjects to these pages; I can’t wait for the next instalment!

Cheers

Dennis
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 19-11-2011, 03:23 PM
alexch's Avatar
alexch (Alex)
Registered User

alexch is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 773
Excellent work and a truly amazing result! APOD candidate for sure.

Alex
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 19-11-2011, 04:28 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,073
Vey cool - extreme imaging.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 19-11-2011, 08:37 PM
John Hothersall's Avatar
John Hothersall
Registered User

John Hothersall is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Thornlands, Brisbane.
Posts: 1,346
Did not think this was possible so congrats on an inspiring hires pp disc.

John.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 20-11-2011, 03:24 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,539
Great result and write up Rolf, very entertaining reading and viewing

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 20-11-2011, 08:15 PM
marc4darkskies's Avatar
marc4darkskies (Marcus)
Billions and Billions ...

marc4darkskies is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Quialigo, NSW
Posts: 3,142
Very cool and very impressive Rolf - love your dedication!

Cheers, Marcus
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 21-11-2011, 11:56 AM
kinetic's Avatar
kinetic (Steve)
ATMer and Saganist

kinetic is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Adelaide S.A.
Posts: 2,287
Hi Rolf,

I did some imaging over the last two nights in very good seeing
and wanted to show you how I went.

Firstly, I did a few rough calcs of what I was up against and
some comparisons of your imaging setup to mine.

Beta Pic is 63.4 LY away or 4,009,484 AU.
WFPC results on Hubble state the disk is roughly 1500AU edge to edge.

From that I worked out how much of the sky the protoplanetary disk would take up.
Trig gives me approx 1.286 arc mins or 77.16 arc sec.
On your f/5 rig and webcam the disk should take up approx 83 pixels.
Thats quite a substantial chunk of your FOV. All good.

On my f/5 rig and DSI II the disk should take up 66 pixels.
Sounds promising so far...with a sensitive enough chip, a big enough
mirror and a mountaintop we might have a chance.

Here is the BUT......

My camera is 16 bit approx, it has a bigger well depth and is mono
as well, meaning it doesn't have a Bayer matrix of RGB filters.
It is peltier cooled also.

Here are my results:

I stacked 150 frames of Beta and did a difference layer mask blend
over a 150 stack of Alpha.
My exposures were adjusted to compensate for the mag difference
method that you mention.
This method, btw, worked incredibly well as the two stellar disks in
the blend were an exact size match.

A curve adjustment of my image result shows no noticeable disk
that I could confidently say might be the PP disk.
Notice that I can, (I think due to the sensitivity of my 16 bit setup)
resolve much more fainter detail very close to the star.

I've noted on your image how much 83 pixels extends and
on mine (a 2x upsample), shown how much 66 pixels is (132 pixels on
a 2x upsize)

I hope this doesn't sound like a dig at you Rolf, but I can honestly say
I really think trying to image what is essentially faint zodiacal IR
glow with a 12 bit webcam, albeit SC1.5 modded is a bit optomistic.
I sincerely hope I am wrong, I have admired your extreme imaging for years.

regards,

Steve
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (139722640.RCeQLcHb.BetaPictorispresentation16112011_scale.jpg)
148.4 KB171 views
Click for full-size image (difference_2x_negative_curves_scaled.jpg)
203.5 KB181 views
Click for full-size image (difference_2x_positive_curves_scaled2.jpg)
197.5 KB178 views

Last edited by kinetic; 21-11-2011 at 12:22 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 23-11-2011, 09:42 AM
SkyViking's Avatar
SkyViking (Rolf)
Registered User

SkyViking is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waitakere Ranges, New Zealand
Posts: 2,260
Quote:
Originally Posted by kinetic View Post
I hope this doesn't sound like a dig at you Rolf, but I can honestly say I really think trying to image what is essentially faint zodiacal IR glow with a 12 bit webcam, albeit SC1.5 modded is a bit optomistic. I sincerely hope I am wrong, I have admired your extreme imaging for years.
Hi Steve, I must say it does feel like a bit of a dig even though you say it isn't. Particularly because it's not the first time you doubt my credibility and I'm really not sure what you're implying by your statements.
But since you've had a go yourself and tried to replicate my results then I'll comment on it:

The literature gives the brightness for the dust disc as 15 magnitudes per square arcsecond. I don't know if that's an average, or only for the brightest part (I suspect the latter), but in any case that is well within the capabilities of amateur equipment. I have captured galaxies of magnitude 21.00 in the past. The challenge here is the overwhelming glare from Beta Pictoris.

Have you read the paper that I linked to? This dust disc was imaged with a Thomson THX 7852 CCD, which is now over 20 years old (Imaging area of 208x144 pixels...) Although I don't know the specs of that particular CCD I wouldn't think a modern webcam is particularly inferior in any way, except when it comes to sensitivity.
I also image with the RAW modification so I'm using the full resolution and am therefore not limited by the Bayer matrix other than when it comes to sensitivity.

Remember that what you see in my processed image is not what it looked like in my raw diff image. As I said, I blended in the parts from the diff image that showed the dust disc onto the normal image of Beta. This was after very careful processing, stretching, noise reduction etc. As a result my dust disc is nothing but a diffuse blur, it was indeed very faint in the raw data. I'm not sure what processing has been done to your diff image, but there seems to be a lot more glare and spikes than I had in mine.
Most importantly your diffraction spikes seem to lie very close to the plane of the dust disc. The position angle you have indicated is actually a little off, I have drawn the correct angle in the attached image which is even closer to the spikes. These spikes would probably put a severe limitation to what can be squeezed out of your data.

Also be aware that I have deliberately removed mirror holding clips and anything else that can produce excess diffraction patterns in my system. I'm using a wire spider with 0.08mm wires, which drastically reduces the amount of diffraction glare (see image of the spider here: http://www.pbase.com/rolfolsen/image/134140252). In your image I notice quite a bit of spikes and glare also around some of the other bright stars - I have also marked these in the attachment. There must have been quite a lot around Beta itself and this would again limit the possibilities of detecting the dust disc I think.
Your diff image also doesn't quite seem to line up, I can see quite large signals from the diffraction spikes that seem to have been different for Alpha and Beta and there is also a difference apparent in the stellar discs.

In addition there could be other reasons for the lack of detection in your images. I don't know what exposure time you used. You CCD is more sensitive than mine, so you'd need shorter exposures than I used, probably a lot shorter. Another complication could be if your skies are light polluted, but I don't know if that's the case.

I hope that answers your questions.

Edit: Can't seem to upload images at the moment, will add it later.

Last edited by SkyViking; 23-11-2011 at 11:37 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 23-11-2011, 09:53 AM
Stevec35 (Steve)
Registered User

Stevec35 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canberra
Posts: 3,654
Very fine work Rolf! Much more impressive than accidentally discovering a globular cluster.

Cheers

Steve
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
beta pictoris, disc, protoplanetary, toucam

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement