Hi Craig
Naturally the customer reviews are from satisfied upgraders

. I believe the customer experience is directly proportional to the quality of the original PST sent for upgrade. If you start with a cracker, you get a cracker result with the upgrade. I have looked through many PSTs and mine was about the middle in terms of wavelength, surface contrast and flare. I have seen some that are way above standard specs i.e. low angstrom pass band and excellent contrast on surface.
What I do see is more scale per any given eyepiece because of the mag increase i.e. moving from 400mm to 600mm and of course brighter at any given mag. I am not convinced I see the resolution gain in the proms, but then again solar viewing is much more affected by daytime seeing and the increase in focal length also magnifies any poor seeing. So my expectations were not quite met and hence going to try a Lunt.
The second fitting is a second blocking filter. This is critical for any solar telescope. One gives you more clearance or field around the sun. One is the smaller original coronado blocking filter and the other is the upgrade.
The scope came as you see it from Denkmeir. Yes the scope is a pre-meade era scope.
Ted
Quote:
Originally Posted by csb
Was the upgrade comparable to the customer reviews, especially as to resolution (detail)? Could you see more detail in the proms?
In your 1st image what is the brass(?) attachment? Looks like an aftermarket eyepiece holder for the PST.
Is your PST from the pre-Meade era?
It looks like the original tube is still in place with an extension on the end. Denkmeir's site says they replace the tube and give yours back. However, their picture of the upgrade looks like yours. So, did you get the original 40mm tube back, unattached?
Thanks Craig
|