Gday Mozzie
I dont know much re the firmware programming in the LS as it uses another new processor ( and i cant be bothered learning how it works )
However i would say the LS vs LX90 has pros and cons both ways
as does chucking in the LT

When the LS works, its great, but for me personally it has too many limitations for anything more than an alt az visual scope.
All three scopes have good optics.
I believe the drivetrains/gears in the LT/LS are better quality than the LX90 ( by a big way )
but, the LT/LS have no clutches and i find the DEC bearings have too much play. No clutch on RA makes doing a polar spin test to set the OTA to DEC = -90deg very difficult and no DEC clutch makes balancing a pain.
Also you cant use a lower weight rail anyway as it blocks the camera view.
The LS uses a single monolithic circuit board ( which includes the motor drivers etc ) so if anything dies, you replace the lot
The LT uses roughly the same motor cards as the LX90, so cheaper to fix if blown.
The LX90 and LT use the 497, 497EP, 497 Audiostar handbox ( where we know the firmware inside out and can patch as reqd ), whereas the LS has a new unknown firmware and we have no visibility for patching.
The LS also "currently" has no "manual" overrides for many functions
ie you cant manually enter site data, you cant do manual 2 star aligns ( where you pick the stars ) which can cause real grief in enclosed areas,
the ASU updater still wont work with the LS.
The LS now has Audio and visual functions, but the scrolling texts have gone. For most this isnt a great drama, but if yr deaf, you wont get much feedback that you can use.
Sooooooo whats the best choice,???????????????????????
If i could, i'd put the LS6" OTA on my ETX-125 base
Andrew