Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 17-01-2006, 08:52 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Reprocessed Saturn from the 11th Jan

Hi guys.

What else to do when there's 6 days straight of clouds? Reprocess.

After speaking with Bird about the artifacts I was getting around the edges of Saturn where it meets with the rings, he suggested it could be one of three things:

1. Not enough light being captured
2. Registax alignment not locking onto the features correctly
3. Too aggressive in the processing

For #1, i'll try capturing a brighter image next time.
For #2, I changed my alignment box area (used size 128) and aligned it on the globe with a bit of the rings. Previously I aligned it on the edge of the rings to pick up the sharpest CD.
For #3, I've now reprocessed the same avi in the following way:

- Registax, to the wavelets tab, RGB align (no wavelets)
- PixInSight LE, wavelet processing and noise reduction
- Registax, histogram and gamma adjust
- Photoshop, colour balance and levels

I've gone much softer on the wavelet processing to try and maintain the "globe" shape, and a sure sign of overprocessing is when the Cassini Division gets wider and wider. So this time, i've gone soft to keep a smaller tigher cassini division.

So on the left is the new image, on teh right is my previous effort.

It's a tough call - I like the CD and shape of the globe better in the new image, but I like the banding right up to the SPC in the old image. The crepe ring is probably a bit more natural looking in the new image too.

So somehow I need to take the best out of both images There's a bit of "fuzziness" to the new image as well which I'm not too fond of.

Anyway, for your consumption and feedback.. here they are.

More experimenting to do..
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (20060111-saturn-reprocess.jpg)
24.0 KB37 views
Click for full-size image (20060111-saturn.jpg)
49.6 KB42 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 17-01-2006, 09:05 AM
bird (Anthony Wesley)
Cyberdemon

bird is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rubyvale QLD
Posts: 2,627
Hey Mike - how large is your raw data? I've been swamped by work and poor weather the last few weeks, but it might be fun to play with someone else's data :-)

regards, Bird
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 17-01-2006, 09:18 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
I sent you the stacked TIFF, but i'm happy to send you the bmp's. I'd love to see what you can get out of my data.

I'll upload it.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 17-01-2006, 09:23 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
oh darn, the zipped set of bmp's is 180meg. It'll take some time to upload.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 17-01-2006, 09:56 AM
bird (Anthony Wesley)
Cyberdemon

bird is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rubyvale QLD
Posts: 2,627
That's ok - can you put it on the website and email me the URL? An archive with the compressed BMP's would be the best way to go.

I've had a play in Astra Image with the image you sent me - sometimes I can spend hours trying different settings and processing options, but so far I've tried:

- split colour planes
- unsharp mask, max strength, power 2.0 on each plane
- deconvolve, ME 5 x 1.5
- recombine
- unsharp mask, same as before, on the colour image.

The result isn't too bad... it would be interesting to start with your raw BMP's.

regards, Bird
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (newsat1.jpg)
8.4 KB41 views
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 17-01-2006, 10:06 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Thanks Anthony.

Here's the URL: everyone is welcome to have a play. But it's 180meg so it's not dialup friendly

Zip of BMPs (180meg)

It's 1100 frames, already sorted and cropped in ppmcentre. I've also already deleted the worst 400 frames from the original 1500 frames.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 17-01-2006, 10:18 AM
bird (Anthony Wesley)
Cyberdemon

bird is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rubyvale QLD
Posts: 2,627
Thanks, downloading it now... estimated 1hr20mins :-)

Bird
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 17-01-2006, 10:44 AM
davidpretorius's Avatar
davidpretorius
lots of eyes on you!

davidpretorius is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 7,381
me too, 47mins to go, i am sure i am slowing you down as well bird.

good to hear from you bird, hopefully you can get back out soon, i am missing those jaw droppers!!!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 17-01-2006, 10:56 AM
bird (Anthony Wesley)
Cyberdemon

bird is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rubyvale QLD
Posts: 2,627
Hi DP - we're sort of in-between planets at the moment, and I'm busy with work stuff as well so I've been a bit quiet lately.

I was hoping to have my 13" mirror by now, but it's still not ready, so that's taken a bit of the excitement out of things - when I finally get it then it'll be full throttle again.

Bird
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 17-01-2006, 01:55 PM
bird (Anthony Wesley)
Cyberdemon

bird is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rubyvale QLD
Posts: 2,627
Okay, here's the version processed from your raw data. What do you think?

regards, Bird
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (sat6.jpg)
21.3 KB26 views
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 17-01-2006, 02:13 PM
davidpretorius's Avatar
davidpretorius
lots of eyes on you!

davidpretorius is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 7,381
very nice.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 17-01-2006, 02:16 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Nice Anthony! Way better than my attempt.

Now spill!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 17-01-2006, 02:18 PM
bird (Anthony Wesley)
Cyberdemon

bird is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rubyvale QLD
Posts: 2,627
Gotta go out for a bit... details later :-)

Bird
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 17-01-2006, 02:20 PM
davidpretorius's Avatar
davidpretorius
lots of eyes on you!

davidpretorius is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 7,381
Quote:
Originally Posted by bird
Gotta go out for a bit... details later :-)

Bird
wot a tease, ice, time to revoke his membership of IIS!!!

send out the hounds and track him down!!! Leave no stone unturned!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 17-01-2006, 04:49 PM
rumples riot
Who knows

rumples riot is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Blackwood South Australia
Posts: 3,051
Still a nice shot regardless Mike. I do like Birds rendition though. Not as heavy on the processing. I would say it is the sequence and some of the settings. Wish Adelaide was not in a seeing hole. Even my great seeing down the south coast did not produce results as sharp as yours. Might move to Barbados. Seeing is good there I hear.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 17-01-2006, 05:00 PM
bird (Anthony Wesley)
Cyberdemon

bird is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rubyvale QLD
Posts: 2,627
Okay, here's what I did...

step 1 - break each colour frame into 3 monochrome frames (red,green,blue).
step 2: process all the red frames through registax and astra image, make a final red master
steps 3 and 4, same as (2) for the other colours
step 5: recombine the red,green and blue frames in astra image.

Doing each colour seperately allows registax to get a better lock on the details, it's evident that the colours all all slightly out of alignment in the raw frames, this is normal for an object that's low in the sky.

Processing the frames in colour mode makes life tough for registax, as the images all look a little blurry, so I don't do that.

The other processing step in Astra Image was to use the "maximum" filter, it has the effect of narrowing the cassini division back to where it's supposed to be, and Maximum Entropy deconvolution.

I used the commandline netpbm tools to automate the splitting of colour planes, via a short shellscript on my Linux machine (sorta like a batch file if you're using Windows).

regards, Bird
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 17-01-2006, 05:00 PM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
gr8 stuff mike... to me there is only a little difference in the post processing pic of yours and anthonys. keep it up
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 17-01-2006, 06:44 PM
davidpretorius's Avatar
davidpretorius
lots of eyes on you!

davidpretorius is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 7,381
Quote:
Originally Posted by bird
I used the commandline netpbm tools to automate the splitting of colour planes, via a short shellscript on my Linux machine (sorta like a batch file if you're using Windows).

regards, Bird
so this program breaks each bmp of mikes into separate red, green & blue. is there a windows version???
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 17-01-2006, 07:11 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
Barbados? Ok, I'll see you there Rumples.

Very nice images Mike & Bird!
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 17-01-2006, 07:53 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Bird, thanks for the info.

I've got netpbm already (from when I planned to do pre-processing a few months ago) - what command line parameters did you use? Better yet, can you email me the shell script? I'm sure I can script it in DOS batch, even though it's been a while since I've played with DOS. Failing that, i'll use one of the unix servers at work It might process it a lot faster than my laptop, too

After creating each master in registax, did you use wavelets, or just save the stacked image?

What parameters did you use for "maximum" and "ME deconvolution"?

Sorry for the questions - next step is using your processing steps to produce the same image myself.. then i'll know how to repeat it for the next images.

I'm sure this procedure is going to add an extra hour to each avi file.. thanks heaps Anthony!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:32 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement