Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 30-05-2010, 11:30 PM
Phil Hart's Avatar
Phil Hart
Registered User

Phil Hart is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mount Glasgow (central Vic)
Posts: 1,091
Rho Ophiuchi mosaic from SPSP

this is my first attempt at pulling together my widefield work from SPSP. there are just a couple of spots that may need a tweak if they are mosaic issues, but i'm reluctant to start hacking away with masks in photoshop until i'm certain they're not supposed to be there:

http://philhart.com/gallery/Astropho...ic_rz.jpg.html

click again for larger size (1500 px). the full size image on my PC is 8500 pixels wide.. Photoshop has been slow today

with five+ hours on four panels, this is now the longest total exposure i've put into a final image.. 21.4 hours and that's after throwing away a few more hours shot at lower altitudes. not bad for a portable setup.. but mainly thanks to (almost) four clear nights in a row!

happy to hear if you think you can spot the joins in the mosaic. taken at the same time at SPSP i also have a mosaic with QHY9 and scope of the central region which i haven't looked at yet..

Phil


oh.. and my Drupal website has decided to throw in some PHP errors as well (but you can still get the image)..
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 30-05-2010, 11:35 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Looks very nice Phil. The only join I can see is on the lower left amongst the nebulosity.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 30-05-2010, 11:38 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,245
Very nice indeed
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 30-05-2010, 11:43 PM
RB's Avatar
RB (Andrew)
Moderator

RB is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 26,530
Yes a lovely mosaic Phil, wow, mammoth amount of hours.
I too can only see one join in the left panel.

Well done.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 30-05-2010, 11:47 PM
Phil Hart's Avatar
Phil Hart
Registered User

Phil Hart is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mount Glasgow (central Vic)
Posts: 1,091
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Haese View Post
Looks very nice Phil. The only join I can see is on the lower left amongst the nebulosity.
ah yes.. i'd missed that one but it's obvious now! i've been worrying too much about the join to the right of Antares.. top edge and bottom edge have some colour transitions that don't look quite right to me..
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 30-05-2010, 11:53 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,368
First thing is wish to say is what an absolutely awesome image project, i love the colour of this part of the sky and the details. It is a wonderful image.

I can see all 3 joins, going from left to right, the dust cloud has a different colours at the bottom. the second join through rho area is just noticeable and pretty good. the third join to the right of antares for some reason has severe colour variation at the join, either that or it is right on the cusp of the colour variation from blue to yellow. Phil its easy to criticise but man what a wonderful image. You more than have my respect
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 30-05-2010, 11:53 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,169
Gorgeous image, really really nice.

Are you going to finish it off? It is screaming for another band of panels along the bottom.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 31-05-2010, 12:03 AM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
Phil,

Oh, my God. That is utterly superb. I am at a loss for words.

This, all, despite being able to see the joins (and associated colour issues) quite easily, but, then, I'm a stickler for detail -- and, the detail is all there -- in the image!

In my opinon, this is, along with Jase's mammoth effort, one of the better images of the Rho Ophiuchii Complex that I've seen. One of the reasons for this is because everyone images this with their mosaics following the tail (and, I'd be inclined to do this, too), but, you've framed it 90-degrees to the norm, and in doing so picked up that seldom-imaged object to the left.

It's images like these which reinforce in my mind why this is the most beautiful part of the entire night sky.

I thought I had done a good job on this with my non-mosaic of this with the 180mm image from 4 years ago, but, I want to do even better and images like yours are just the inspiration.

Well done.

H
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 31-05-2010, 05:02 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
That's a stunning image, Phil. Incredible effort well worth it.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 31-05-2010, 05:38 AM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
Ahh, so thats what frantic earnest activity produces .Although come to think of it, this rig was the one that was left to crank away on its own all night?.

Excellent Phil, smooth sharp and detailed, a huge effort with a DSLR, masterfull colour processing.

One small thing. The stars on the right look a lot brighter and sort of "joined" together (albiet with a lot of zooming in).
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 31-05-2010, 08:35 AM
marc4darkskies's Avatar
marc4darkskies (Marcus)
Billions and Billions ...

marc4darkskies is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Quialigo, NSW
Posts: 3,142
Wow! That's a gorgeous image Phil!!

Cheers, Marcus
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 31-05-2010, 08:40 AM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,077
Ha!..been waiting for this one. What a shot. Terrific field. I thought the panels were 4 panels in a square. Do you have a higher res shot (>1500px) anywhere online?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 31-05-2010, 08:46 AM
desler's Avatar
desler
Registered User

desler is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Werribee, Australia
Posts: 1,053
A very nice image Phil, Don't care if I can see joins, absolutely stunning area of the night sky and beautifully presented. Thanks for the view.



Darren
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 31-05-2010, 09:11 AM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,625
Lovely image Phil and I agree with Humi the framing is a feature. The mosaic issues are evident but do not detract from the overall scene. I've always loved that hourse head shapped nebulosity.

Great job again, boy David (and any potential assistant) is gunna have a hard time THIS year ...

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 31-05-2010, 10:26 AM
Phil Hart's Avatar
Phil Hart
Registered User

Phil Hart is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mount Glasgow (central Vic)
Posts: 1,091
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb View Post
Ha!..been waiting for this one. What a shot. Terrific field. I thought the panels were 4 panels in a square. Do you have a higher res shot (>1500px) anywhere online?
The mosaic through the scope is four panels in a square.. that one will take even more work. That's what you saw me working on with the laptop connected to the QHY9.

Will post a higher res version of this one when I've tweaked the processing..
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 31-05-2010, 10:29 AM
Moon's Avatar
Moon (James)
This sentence is false

Moon is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,158
Phil,

I've been looking forward to seeing this one too. Well done - I admire your stamina to collect that amount of data.

James
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 31-05-2010, 10:36 AM
Phil Hart's Avatar
Phil Hart
Registered User

Phil Hart is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mount Glasgow (central Vic)
Posts: 1,091
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley View Post
Gorgeous image, really really nice.

Are you going to finish it off? It is screaming for another band of panels along the bottom.

Greg.
Ha! If I had another four nights and 21 hours I’d be tempted to do that, but I might also just double up on the same area to go deeper (and smoother) again!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 31-05-2010, 10:46 AM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,077
Quote:
Originally Posted by philiphart View Post
The mosaic through the scope is four panels in a square.. that one will take even more work. That's what you saw me working on with the laptop connected to the QHY9.
Got it now That was the small rig with the 40D on the side. The other one is the panorama I'm waiting for That's gonna knock a few socks off I reckon.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 31-05-2010, 10:49 AM
rogerg's Avatar
rogerg (Roger)
Registered User

rogerg is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 4,563
Great image! Quite different cropping/field of view to what I normally see. Wonderful colour, detail and clarity.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 31-05-2010, 12:04 PM
Phil Hart's Avatar
Phil Hart
Registered User

Phil Hart is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mount Glasgow (central Vic)
Posts: 1,091
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassnut View Post
Ahh, so thats what frantic earnest activity produces .Although come to think of it, this rig was the one that was left to crank away on its own all night?.
Yes.. the frantic effort was focussed on the scope and CCD. this widefield rig ran pretty much unsupervised most of the time. that's the only way i could get so many hours in.. quite enjoyable to have this ticking away while i bash my ahead against the issues associated with CCD imaging/guiding etc.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassnut View Post
One small thing. The stars on the right look a lot brighter and sort of "joined" together (albiet with a lot of zooming in).
Yes.. I think that's just a result of getting further into the milky way. The processing to pull out the faint stuff is probably overdoing the stars but hard not to without creating other artefacts. Looks a little better perhaps before being resized.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassnut View Post
Excellent Phil, smooth sharp and detailed, a huge effort with a DSLR
So now you need an EQ6 and a DSLR??
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement