I got the OSC, and it is a pretty good match with my FS60. A little undersampled (~2.8 arcsec/ pixel), but the three nights the weather, dog, kids and laziness has allowed me a couple of hours have resulted in some good shots.
The supplied RGB utility is a little rough on the raw frames (see my First (Real) DSO image thread), but if you allow deep sky stacker to do the debayering, it makes a huge difference. Also, reading the manual makes a huge difference too
Attached is my Carinae taken a couple of weeks ago. It is 80x90sec frames on an unguided p2Z at the native FS60 355mm focal length. The focus could have been better and I couldn't use my flats(taken with a t-shirt, but now I have one of Peter's (exfso) lightboxes, and there have been marked improvements every time I go out.
I think this camera will last me a while. Although, that can be famous last words with me. I have a combination of upgrade fever and a love/hate relationship with this hobby.
So three bad nights in a row or a cooled 8MP camera with 3 micron pixels could see it in the IIS classifieds yet

Quote:
Originally Posted by darrellx
Matt
Good to hear. I am considering the same option at the moment. Did you get the mono or OSC?
Thanks
Darrell
|