Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 20-03-2010, 12:15 PM
sjastro's Avatar
sjastro
Registered User

sjastro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,926
Bran 147 A/B (Bipolar planetary nebula).

A very faint object that required a total of 10.5 hrs of exposure.

8.5 hrs L=R, 1 hr R, 1 hr G, 1 hr B BRC-250, ST-X10ME.



Highly stretched inverted image showing outer extensions.
http://users.westconnect.com.au/~sjastro/bran147g.jpg


AAO report on the object.

"PHR 0825-4013 (RCW 24, BRAN 147 A/B).
This unusually large bipolar PN was noted serendipitously by DJF from Sky Survey R films in 1995, and later reported as a possible new PN (Frew 1997), before being independently found on the AAO/UKST Hα Survey by Parker in 1998. It has a moderately-high red surface brightness, and had been previously catalogued as an HII region by Rodgers, Campbell and Whiteoak (1960) where it was given the designation RCW 24, and by Brand, Blitz & Wouterloot (1986).

A red image is presented by Neckel & Vehrenberg (1990), where it was again assumed to be a H
II region. However, even in deep UKST R-band images it exhibits evidence of classic bipolar morphology, with two wedge-shaped emission knots rather symmetrically placed around an 18th-magnitude blue central star candidate. Perhaps the sheer angular size of the object and close proximity to the Vela SNR mitigated against its identification as a possible PN. The new, deep, AAO/UKST Hα image (fig.1) has now revealed the fainter outer extensions of this PN for the first time, whilst preliminary spectra taken on the SAAO 1.9m show intense [NII] lines at λλ6548, 6584, allowing classification as a type I PN. "



Regards

Steven
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 20-03-2010, 04:53 PM
CoolhandJo's Avatar
CoolhandJo (Paul)
Registered User

CoolhandJo is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,804
Amazing obscure object and very well described and captured! The 10+ hours looks to be every bit worth it IMHO.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 21-03-2010, 06:02 AM
sjastro's Avatar
sjastro
Registered User

sjastro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,926
Thanks Paul.

Not your run of the mill object for imaging.
Given that it is barely brighter than the sky glow from my site, it proved quite a challenge to extract information from the raw data.

Steven
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 10:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement