ICEINSPACE
Moon Phase
CURRENT MOON
Waxing Crescent 31.1%
|
|

24-11-2005, 01:58 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 31
|
|
skywatcher collimator
The only collimator in stock at my local telescope shop is a skywatcher collimation tool. I asked him if this was a sight tube/cheshire combination tool and he said ???????.
He described it as including a mirror and cross hairs. I had a look online and from the outside it does look the same as Orions sight tube/Cheshire combination tool.
Is it? Any reason not to buy this for my 8" F/3.75 newtonian?
|

24-11-2005, 06:24 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: S.A.
Posts: 1,079
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jps
Any reason not to buy this for my 8" F/3.75 newtonian?
|
At F3.75 collimation is pretty fickle, you would be better off with a cheshire that suits that f ratio.
|

24-11-2005, 06:48 PM
|
 |
4000 post club member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
|
|
Ths skywatcher one if the same as the synta one is a loose fit to the focuser and wobbles. The Orion one is a better fit but still way too long for a f3.75 scope.
I would buy the short GS cheshire from Andrews and get/make a sight tube to fit your f ratio.
Last edited by Starkler; 24-11-2005 at 07:01 PM.
|

24-11-2005, 08:07 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 31
|
|
Quote:
I would buy the short GS cheshire from Andrews and get/make a sight tube to fit your f ratio.
|
Appreciate the replies,
The buying of the short GS cheshire I'm sure I could handle.
As for the get/make a sight tube to fit my f ratio, I wouldn't have a clue.
|

24-11-2005, 08:34 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sale, VIC
Posts: 6,033
|
|
The cheapo short-tube is the most inaccurate. The cross hairs and the outside diameter of the opening you are looking through may not not be central. But you can work around it by rotating in focuser and rechecking/readjusting whilst allowing for anything in the tool being off-centre. That's a very fast scope you have there. Maybe you should also get the sort of auto-collimator that Bird uses.
|

24-11-2005, 09:47 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 31
|
|
auto-collimator?
|

24-11-2005, 09:53 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sale, VIC
Posts: 6,033
|
|
Sorry, actually it's one word: autocollimator. Try google (or Bird).
|

27-11-2005, 09:11 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 31
|
|
Contacted Jim Fly. I'm considering buying the catseye Tripplepack Kit which includes the blackcat cheshire, the teletube sight tube, and the infinity autocollimator. $196 US, so I'm thinking maybe $300 including postage.
The only reason I would do this is if I believe this will give me a noticable improvement in image quality compared to using a more everyday collimating set for my newtonian(turns out its an F/4).
Could a cheaper option give me the same results? Would I really notice the difference? It's a lot of money, but maybe its worth it.
|

30-11-2005, 10:12 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: S.A.
Posts: 1,079
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jps
Contacted Jim Fly. I'm considering buying the catseye Tripplepack Kit which includes the blackcat cheshire, the teletube sight tube, and the infinity autocollimator. $196 US, so I'm thinking maybe $300 including postage.
The only reason I would do this is if I believe this will give me a noticable improvement in image quality compared to using a more everyday collimating set for my newtonian(turns out its an F/4).
Could a cheaper option give me the same results? Would I really notice the difference? It's a lot of money, but maybe its worth it.
|
You get what you pay for jps. That is a top of the range, precision made set of tools. Adjustable to your F ratio, easy to use and you can check and adjust your collimation quickly anytime through the night.
With experience, I wouldn't doubt some people 'may' acheive the same standard of collimation with the cheapest of tools, but not as easily.
|

30-11-2005, 02:44 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 31
|
|
Can anyone tell me what size sight tube I need for my F/4?
|

30-11-2005, 04:50 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bathurst, NSW
Posts: 330
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ausastronomer
The sight tube really needs to be matched reasonably closely to the F-Ratio of the scope. It doesn't have to be exact ie An F5 sight tube on an F6 scope will be fine, an F7 sight tube on an F4.5 scope won't help much. My combination cheshire/sight tube is optimised for an F5 scope and the sight tube is about 5 inches long. The F-Ratio that Andrews device is optimised for is anyone's guess with the thing only being 3" long.
CS-John B
|
NB: I edited some unnecessary parts out.
This came from this thread. Hence you would need a Cheshire around 5" long, or there abouts.
|

30-11-2005, 07:10 PM
|
 |
4000 post club member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
|
|
To match a sight tube up to the focal ratio:
length = (tube inner diameter) x f ratio.
Im getting a sight tube made for me optimised for f5.
|

30-11-2005, 07:37 PM
|
 |
A FN Observer
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Morayfield
Posts: 120
|
|
Starkler,
With your formula, I'm assuming that the tube inner diameter you refer to is the focussing sight tube diameter, ie. it's either 1.25ins or 2ins? Also, once using the correct length sight tube, what is the correct position for the focusser, in or out?
Cheers,
Graeme
|

30-11-2005, 07:46 PM
|
 |
4000 post club member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hogly52
Starkler,
With your formula, I'm assuming that the tube inner diameter you refer to is the focussing sight tube diameter, ie. it's either 1.25ins or 2ins? Also, once using the correct length sight tube, what is the correct position for the focusser, in or out?
|
.
Graeme, for a sight tube to fit a 1.25 inch focuser, the length is F x the inside diameter of the sight tube. ie 1.25 inch minus 2x the wall thickness of the sight tube.
A correctly sized sight tube will alow you to visually align the secondary mirror to the edge of the sight tube, while simultaneously being able to see all of your primary mirror reflected in the secondary. Adjust the focuser so that this happens. This allows you to align your secondary easily and accurately.
|

30-11-2005, 07:56 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 31
|
|
Could I buy a sight tube of the shelf and cut it to length?
|

30-11-2005, 08:11 PM
|
 |
4000 post club member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
|
|
You could if you can make an accurate square cut and dont mind cutting the cross hairs off the end.
|

30-11-2005, 09:19 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: S.A.
Posts: 1,079
|
|
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bigdob/message/9677
Not the thread I was after but the link above touches on the subject of adjusting a sighttube to alter the F ratio.
Reducing the internal diameter can acheive the same result, depends which you think is easier/better. Sliding the sighttube in/out may give the final adjustment.
|

30-11-2005, 09:31 PM
|
 |
A FN Observer
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Morayfield
Posts: 120
|
|
Starkler,
Thanks for that info.
Graeme
|

01-12-2005, 02:27 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 31
|
|
Can anyone tell me how the barlowed laser technique compares to using an autocollimator for the primary mirror?
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:21 AM.
|
|