Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 24-01-2010, 04:55 AM
Tom Davis's Avatar
Tom Davis (Tom)
Registered User

Tom Davis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Inkom, ID USA
Posts: 589
My Rosette Sidonio

OK, I agree with most of you that my LRGB Rosette looked a little
"burned out" around the outer core. So I decided to reprocess the
data.
I like this second processing better; It still retains the detail and
the dust (thank goodness) but the area rimming the core does not
appear as burnt out and "flat" to me. True? No? Better? Worse? To see
the original just click "Back".


http://www.tvdavisastropics.com/astroimages-1_0000b4.htm


Thanks for your advise.


Tom
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 24-01-2010, 05:11 AM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,689
Ah well well, a Davis doing a Sidonio ...I'd do a Davis but I don't get to the really dark skies necessary to reveal all that dust well...so lets just do the Macarena instead

Yes I think this version is a bit better but it still looks not quite right to me...perhaps your pantented dust revealing process is creating a non matching transition between the main nebula and the outer regions of faint stuff and the inner region is a little too pink

Still, overall a striking image

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 24-01-2010, 05:49 AM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
Colour still seems very different to the way the rosette is usually shown.. It is much better though, the sidonio shows a lot more texture in the red rim, better contrast on the dust, stars seem a little reduced.. I like it..
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 24-01-2010, 09:10 AM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Hi Tom, although you've managed to bring lot more details and contrast in this version I liked the original process. As a whole this picture looks "flatter". Somehow the dynamic range and luminosity in the first one was just right to me. But again it's personal taste. Like colors.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 24-01-2010, 09:21 AM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,185
Spectacular image overall but I tend to agree with Mike the colours are a tad overcooked (I should talk right?) but then I am using a new computer and not 100% sure of this monitors colour performance although so far it seems fairly good.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 24-01-2010, 09:26 AM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,286
Tom don't change a thing from the original post trying to please others as you should know art is in the eye of the beholder and often when basing changes on the opinions of others we can stuiff it up or go too left field.

Personally of the two I preferred the original (maybe with a tad less pink, pink and green are IMO just wrong) but thats just me, see what I mean !!!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 24-01-2010, 10:44 AM
Hagar (Doug)
Registered User

Hagar is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,646
I don't know about this one Tom. I found the first rendition more asthetically pleasing. I don't quite know how I would describe this. Maybe stark.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement