Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 19-11-2005, 03:05 PM
davidpretorius's Avatar
davidpretorius
lots of eyes on you!

davidpretorius is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 7,381
My year of planets 2005

Starting putting together a composite of all my best images.

I have two of mars. Both have had exactly the same wavelets settings and lr & me deconvolution.

The higher one had the r,g,b all processed separately in registax. Not sure if it has made a difference and is worth all the extra effort???
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Planets.jpg)
98.8 KB39 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 19-11-2005, 03:14 PM
mick pinner's Avatar
mick pinner
Astrolounge

mick pinner is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: monbulk-vic
Posts: 2,010
very nice Dave, certainly coming along well.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 19-11-2005, 03:29 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
Hi Davo! Well done. I think it would be interesting for you to do a 'bad to not so bad' too like I did, so we can see how far you've 'evolved'...but perhaps you have not got enough images for this yet?

It can't be easy doing this with no tracking mate. I congratulate you on the effort put forth by you on this!! I can't WAIT for you to get either an EQ mount or get tracking on your dob mount....then you can just setup/start capturing 5000 or so frames in one hit while your sitting there swilling down a beer or a coffee......(watever you prefer)

I'm going out on a limb 1st chance I get....to capture 6-8 mins of continuous AVI. I've been teaching myself on getting a close to perfect polar alignment by trial & error over the past couple of weeks. Cracked the technique last night! I should be able to get 5 or 6 mins continuous without mars/saturn moving off the screen.

I read your comment about you not being able to allocate how many frames per sec. Initially I had this same trouble, but then I found out one has to allocate in 2 or 3 different places in the original toucam software for the changes to take effect.

My trouble is, if I try to shoot quicker than 5FPS I will drop heaps of frames, this apparently is due to the lappy not having a very big hard disk & small RAM? (or so I've read)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19-11-2005, 03:52 PM
davidpretorius's Avatar
davidpretorius
lots of eyes on you!

davidpretorius is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 7,381
I have included jupiter as my first attempts, but have reprocessed it and it has improved 100%. Hard now to go back now as i have overwritten the old processed jupiter
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 19-11-2005, 04:08 PM
Robert_T's Avatar
Robert_T
aiming for 2nd Halley's

Robert_T is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,959
Hi David - great idea to put this "best of" together, must do that myself sometime soon. I don't know how you manage to get detailed images at all without tracking, it's hard enough with!
cheers,
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 19-11-2005, 04:18 PM
Striker's Avatar
Striker (Tony)
Whats visual Astronomy

Striker is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,062
A credit to you David...you must be happy with your results so far.

I couldn't even comprehend imaging without tracking.

Well done
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 19-11-2005, 04:49 PM
davidpretorius's Avatar
davidpretorius
lots of eyes on you!

davidpretorius is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 7,381
thanks all. It is funny, I do want tracking, but for planets it is for convenience, as I remember pulling myself up and thinking how quickly i was lining up saturn through the guide scope, turning to computer, waiting for image, take 7 secs of vid, reposition guide scope and do it again. 10 passes were done in pretty short order and this gave me 300 images.

Now, for dso's I am itching to try this modded toucam, I am hanging out for tracking!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 19-11-2005, 06:15 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
What's even more funny is I have no particular desire to image DSOs etc....just planets!

I think that's because deep down I know my tracking on either of my scopes won't be good enough. Top of the line EQ mounts are financially out of my league at present!

Maybe in my next life!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 19-11-2005, 07:04 PM
bird (Anthony Wesley)
Cyberdemon

bird is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rubyvale QLD
Posts: 2,627
DP, the top mars image shows a bit of misalignment between the colours, when you used the RGB combine did you set the colour shifts?

Edit - I've had a go at fixing the alignment, looks like you should have another go at that top mars image, I think there's more detail possible. Here's what I got by processing your jpeg a bit more.

regards, Bird
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (mars.jpg)
7.2 KB13 views

Last edited by bird; 19-11-2005 at 07:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 19-11-2005, 07:32 PM
avandonk's Avatar
avandonk
avandonk

avandonk is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,786
Thats amazing David I did not know you had no tracking.This can be fixed.Why I dont do high resolution images is because of the light pollution.What mount have you got.

Bert
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 19-11-2005, 08:37 PM
davidpretorius's Avatar
davidpretorius
lots of eyes on you!

davidpretorius is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 7,381
Quote:
Originally Posted by avandonk
Thats amazing David I did not know you had no tracking.This can be fixed.Why I dont do high resolution images is because of the light pollution.What mount have you got.

Bert
thanks, i have a dob mount sitting on a dob buggy of mick pinners. It has a wedge, which i am hoping to drive real soon
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 19-11-2005, 08:38 PM
davidpretorius's Avatar
davidpretorius
lots of eyes on you!

davidpretorius is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 7,381
Quote:
Originally Posted by bird
DP, the top mars image shows a bit of misalignment between the colours, when you used the RGB combine did you set the colour shifts?

Edit - I've had a go at fixing the alignment, looks like you should have another go at that top mars image, I think there's more detail possible. Here's what I got by processing your jpeg a bit more.

regards, Bird
thanks bird, do you suggest wavelets or deconvolution?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 19-11-2005, 09:01 PM
bird (Anthony Wesley)
Cyberdemon

bird is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rubyvale QLD
Posts: 2,627
Well, I usually do both... but it depends on the data.

The main issues with the top mars image in your post is that the colour planes weren't aligned in Astra Image when you did the RGB combine, and the colour weights needed to be adjusted as well to correct the colour.

regards, Bird
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement