Quote:
Originally Posted by renormalised
Image isn't here, Doug. It may not have uploaded properly.
|
Sorry I forgot to upload the image.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Astrobserver99
Fantastic image Doug!. The clarity and detail are excellent.
|
Thanks, clear skies do help a lot.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidU
Beautiful Doug !
|
Thanks David.
Quote:
Originally Posted by h0ughy
lovely image Doug. Do yourself a favour - download pixinsight - the trial version (current) and try the Dynamic background extraction function (DBE) there are a few other functions as well.
|
Thanks David, I have downloaded a copy now all i have to do is work out what I am doing with it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RB
Nicely done Doug !
I'm going to look into this PixInSight that Houghy keeps sprooking, sounds cool.
Do you have Gradient Xtreminator, that helps with gradients too.
Even though 253 is small with this setup, I kind of like the image scale, to see it floating out there.

|
Thanks Andrew, I have a copy but sometimes find it just better to mask and average blur the background does a better job overall.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffkop
Looks really good to me Doug. Stars are perfect and focus perfect and widerfield shots seem to give everything a home to me.
|
Thanks Jeff
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrevorW
Very nice Doug plenty of detail for 5 minute exposures having a dark site to capture sure makes the difference on required exposure time to capture optimum SNR as you haven't lost any detail in the cropped version
|
Thanks Trevor, having nice clear dark skies makes a huge diference.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mill
Both pictures look good Doug 
It could be my monitor or my eyes, but the back ground looks a tiny bit hanging to the green side (as i said it could be my eyes).
|
Thanks Martin, My laptop is due for a re calibrate so you could well be correct.