Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 12-10-2009, 01:37 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Reprocessed sculptor

Decided that Mike Sidonio is right about trying reprocessing images several times to find what you like best. In fact I tried using several images from Mike and Stuart to get the colour looking correct. Your thoughts?

This is the most current image since I reprocessed the data. I like the colour better, the stars are smaller and not as eaten into. Star colours though look not quite right. How does one get the star colours right with LRGB processing?

All good fun though.

Image here

thanks for looking.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-10-2009, 03:36 PM
DavidU's Avatar
DavidU (Dave)
Like to learn

DavidU is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: melbourne
Posts: 4,835
Nice work Paul ! I was just having a peep at 253 last night.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-10-2009, 05:07 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,691
Quote:
Decided that Mike Sidonio is right about trying reprocessing images several times to find what you like best
Of course! what's the problem with it..? ...I dunno? astroimaging etiquette is a funny thing


Quote:
In fact I tried using several images from Mike and Stuart to get the colour looking correct. Your thoughts?
Obviously they are perfect then

Nah, seriously, it looks pretty good Paul and way better than this one http://paulhaese.net/NGC253closeup.html

Do you have a larger image to give it a more critical inspection? with that kit you have now ya gotta be able to show it nearer to full size man or what's the point of the expense in getting such great gear

Very nice job

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-10-2009, 05:21 PM
Hagar (Doug)
Registered User

Hagar is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,646
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Haese View Post
Decided that Mike Sidonio is right about trying reprocessing images several times to find what you like best. In fact I tried using several images from Mike and Stuart to get the colour looking correct. Your thoughts?

This is the most current image since I reprocessed the data. I like the colour better, the stars are smaller and not as eaten into. Star colours though look not quite right. How does one get the star colours right with LRGB processing?

All good fun though.

Image here

thanks for looking.
The easiest way to lift your star colour is to create a star layer either now or earlier in the processing. Lift the colour saturation till you are happy, slight gausian blur and the job is done.

Your original above looks pretty good though.
Here is a quick one.

Ah Sidonios, they now have a name, learning from master Mike.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (stars.jpg)
190.7 KB44 views
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-10-2009, 05:22 PM
desler's Avatar
desler
Registered User

desler is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Werribee, Australia
Posts: 1,053
Yes Paul,


Not much else to say, I like all of the versions!

Darren
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-10-2009, 05:52 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Colors look much better than your first version posted although the center is a bit burnt out /clipped still. Good pic though.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-10-2009, 06:02 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Mike here you go. This image is 1800 x 1891 pixels. 1.51mb in size.

Image here

It contains the warts and all. Mike I reckon just because I have the kit does not qualify that the images will be good. That is part of this voyage I guess; learning how to make better images.

Doug - good tip. I will give that a go when I get some more data. Just a little noise creeping into the image but a great tip.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-10-2009, 06:09 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,286
Hi Paul I noticed with mine the slight star egginess for want of a better word is this issue seeing, tracking, flex or still collimation.

nice image by the way
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-10-2009, 06:14 PM
spearo's Avatar
spearo (Frank)
accepts all donations

spearo is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Braidwood (outskirts)
Posts: 2,281
Looks good!
frank
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-10-2009, 08:41 PM
Tamtarn's Avatar
Tamtarn
Barb and David

Tamtarn is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Warragul. Victoria.
Posts: 2,293
Prefer this repro more than the earlier post Paul. The colour seems to be more correct

Great image
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-10-2009, 10:12 PM
rat156's Avatar
rat156
Registered User

rat156 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,696
Hi Paul,

I found a tip about colour saturation retention on the web somewhere.

Create your colour image like normal, I use the CCDStack colour create or Photoshop. Copy the image and paste it over the luminance image (which you have already converted to RGB) twice, change the middle layer combine mode to multiply, and the top one to colour. Now muck about with the transparency of the middle layer with the slider and select the top layer and change the saturation level. Remember with saturation levels you can act on each colour RGBCMY individually to selectively knock out a colour cast. I often need to do this to remove a green cast from LP.

Oh, BTW, much better, but a little too violet for my liking, but colour is a personal preference.

Cheers
Stuart
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-10-2009, 10:33 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,185
Great shot Paul. You must be happy with that one.

A couple of stars in front of the galaxy itself got oversharpened when
you used a mask.

You can reverse the mask by clicking on black to be the foreground colour and then anything you rub then gets removed from the sharpening layer and the stars don't look oversharpened.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 13-10-2009, 09:51 AM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Greg I am pretty happy with the shot. Like you said some processing stuff needs sorting, but most importantly I need to get the stars sorted. Flexure or guiding is at fault and it is really bugging me. Several images I have done this year don't have it and several do. Strongman has given me an idea about positioning the guide camera in the same orientation as the imaging camera and those being north/south. I will give this a try as anything could be at fault. I suspect flexure is causing the really problem. Using my TSA as a guide scope might help too, since it has the longer focal length.

Always more to get right, but happy given this is my third Monochrome DSO image.

Thanks everyone for the comments and tips.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement