Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > Astronomy and Amateur Science
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 22-08-2009, 10:05 PM
bojan's Avatar
bojan
amateur

bojan is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mt Waverley, VIC
Posts: 6,944
No acceleration of expansion and no dark energy?

This may be interesting...

http://arxiv.org/abs/0901.1639
http://www.pnas.org/content/early/20...27106.abstract
http://www.space.com/scienceastronom...ternative.html
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 22-08-2009, 10:34 PM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
Sounds very interesting....downloaded the .pdf and I'll read it later.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 23-08-2009, 09:18 AM
sheeny's Avatar
sheeny (Al)
Spam Hunter

sheeny is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oberon NSW
Posts: 14,311
Interesting. Thanks Bojan.

I've scanned the PDF, but I'll have to spend more time to digest it.

Al.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 23-08-2009, 12:24 PM
Robh's Avatar
Robh (Rob)
Registered User

Robh is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Blue Mountains, Australia
Posts: 1,333
Very interesting!

Hopefully, alternative explanations like this one will eventually get astronomy back on track and the unpalatable Dark Energy will be shelved. It's about time someone questioned the perception of an accelerating expansion!

Interesting that the wave flow through space-time is not mentioned in connection with gravity. Is this different to a gravitational wave?

Regards, Rob
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 23-08-2009, 12:49 PM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
I have a funny feeling that the CC will be around for awhile longer, yet. The problem with an accelerating expansion is that it doesn't fit in with everyone's nice and tidy little views of how things should be and they're still trying to get used to it. Although, if something better comes along that explains all the observational evidence and fits all the mathematical parameters more efficiently than accelerated expansion (DE and CC), then all the more cuedos to it. However, it's got some rather large hurdles to overcome.

And that's the first one....I haven't read the paper yet, but what they're going to have to explain to everyone satisfactorily is what is the wave. If it's not gravity, or EM derived then what is it...a disturbance in the Higgs Field, vibrating spacetime, torsional stress on spacetime caused by a rotating universe, an observational effect of another universe's presence on our spacetime??. Who knows?? Could be random noise in spacetime generated when gravity froze out from the other forces, or some disturbance (other than inflation) generated when the false vacuum collapsed at the beginning of inflation. But no matter what its origin and what it is, like I said, it's going to have to explain all the observational evidence and satisfy the rest of cosmological theory.

Last edited by renormalised; 23-08-2009 at 01:06 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement