Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Eyepieces, Barlows and Filters
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 11-06-2009, 06:20 PM
Astrobserver99's Avatar
Astrobserver99 (Rob)
Starlit Night

Astrobserver99 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bellarine Peninsula, Victoria
Posts: 505
F/6.3 Focal Reducer

I purchased the Antares f/6.3 SCT Focal Reducer for use on my C8. JUst got around to trying it out the other day. I found a couple of problems straight away:

1. Cannot reach focus with the Crayford focuser attached
2. Attaching the camera or EP directly to the visual back I can reach focus but not with a diagonal attached.

These problems limit its usefulness.

I was under the impression these problems were were fixed with FR's in general a few years back? Was I sold an older version?

Cheers, Rob
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-06-2009, 06:29 PM
dannat's Avatar
dannat (Daniel)
daniel

dannat is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Macedon shire, Australia
Posts: 3,427
the focal reducer on my mak reached focus , though there wasn't a lot of room left.
When attaching the camera do you usually have the diagonal in the path? i never used my diagonal when photographing so it wasn't a problem.

For 1. - when you say you can't reach focus with the crayford what do you have next in line form the focuser out?

Some of the focal reducers come to focus with cameras but not necesarily visually
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-06-2009, 06:36 PM
Astrobserver99's Avatar
Astrobserver99 (Rob)
Starlit Night

Astrobserver99 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bellarine Peninsula, Victoria
Posts: 505
The train is like this:

C8/F6.3 Reducer/GSO Crayford/EP or Camera

What would happen if I put the reducer at the end of the focuser?, like this:

C8/Crayford Focuser/f6.3 Reducer/EP or Camera

Last edited by Astrobserver99; 11-06-2009 at 06:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-06-2009, 06:56 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
Why use the diagnonal?, it adds a lot of distance. I have an AP6.7FR on my 12" Meade with NP (and an autofocuser), would be similar to your C8. Ditch the diagonal, it just adds flex problems.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-06-2009, 07:04 PM
Astrobserver99's Avatar
Astrobserver99 (Rob)
Starlit Night

Astrobserver99 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bellarine Peninsula, Victoria
Posts: 505
OK, the diagonal is ditched, problem solved.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-06-2009, 09:13 PM
dannat's Avatar
dannat (Daniel)
daniel

dannat is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Macedon shire, Australia
Posts: 3,427
soory i didn't explain myself but the focuser on mine always came straight after the OTA, then reducer then camera or whatever
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement