Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 01-04-2009, 09:54 PM
rat156's Avatar
rat156
Registered User

rat156 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,696
Saturn 31-3-2009

Hi All,

Saturn from last night.

I cheated and stacked some separate stacks to make a composite image. Didn't have any detail of the clouds on the ones I've checked so far and this smooths the image out a bit.

Added the best of the single images. An animation showed differences between the images due to exposure and framerate, but little or no difference in the planet itself.

Cheers
Stuart
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Saturn1.jpg)
22.6 KB114 views
Click for full-size image (Saturn090331.jpg)
15.3 KB49 views

Last edited by rat156; 02-04-2009 at 09:30 PM. Reason: Added image
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-04-2009, 10:22 PM
mental4astro's Avatar
mental4astro (Alexander)
kids+wife+scopes=happyman

mental4astro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: sydney, australia
Posts: 5,006
Fine image Stuart,

I don't do any imaging, just good old eyeballing.

Curious, how does atmospheric turbulance affect the ability to take a sufficent number of 'photos' at high power.

Question might be 'amateurish', but more awkward. I guess I'm sort of asking, you must take a heck of a lot of shots?

Alex
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-04-2009, 10:55 PM
rat156's Avatar
rat156
Registered User

rat156 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,696
Hi Alex,

I, like most of the guys here use a webcam to take video, then software to stack the individual frames into one still picture.

This one is a combination of 5 movies, each of 1500 frames, of which the best 500 to 1000 are selected and stacked.

I use a monochrome ccd to get the luminance, then add the colour from another webcam that takes colour movies.

Cheers
Stuart
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-04-2009, 06:49 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Lovely sharp image, Stuart. Good colour. Nice job.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-04-2009, 08:02 AM
rat156's Avatar
rat156
Registered User

rat156 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,696
Hi Mike,

Thanks. I was a bit concerned about the colour, looking at Bird's great pics, but then I saw the Hubble shots of the Titan transit, so they are supposed to be pastels. I tried to bring a little more colour out in the image, but It looked overprocessed.

The blue fringe is the hardest bit to get rid of, the skies down here have been terrible lately, a slow moving weather system giving us very smoggy skies, which I suspect are the cause of the problem.

Cheers
Stuart
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-04-2009, 11:35 AM
lacad01's Avatar
lacad01 (Adam)
The sky is Messier here!

lacad01 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Darwin
Posts: 2,587
Nice one, very impressive!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-04-2009, 09:32 PM
rat156's Avatar
rat156
Registered User

rat156 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,696
Added best single image. Which do you prefer?

Cheers
Stuart
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-04-2009, 09:42 PM
Screwdriverone's Avatar
Screwdriverone (Chris)
I have detailed files....

Screwdriverone is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kellyville Ridge, NSW Australia
Posts: 3,306
Door number one please Stuart,

Both are pretty damn good though.

Great work!

Regards

Chris
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-04-2009, 10:11 PM
mental4astro's Avatar
mental4astro (Alexander)
kids+wife+scopes=happyman

mental4astro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: sydney, australia
Posts: 5,006
Saturn

Hi,

They both tell slightly different stories, first more polished, second more as you might see it through the eyepiece.

Another Q. In using webcams, is polar alignment as critical when using todays' modern mounts , or the GPS style fork mounted SCT?

Eyepiece projection?

Alex
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-04-2009, 10:18 PM
rat156's Avatar
rat156
Registered User

rat156 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,696
Hi Alex,

Polar aligment is not important, it's irrelevant. You can do this Alt-Az or even untracked, though at long focal length it'll move out of frame pretty quickly.

Can't answer the eyepiece projection question, never tried it. I try and keep as little glass between the object and the CCD, cheap glass doesn't work at high magnifications, and expensive glass is, well, expensive.

Cheers
Stuart
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-04-2009, 08:03 PM
Inmykombi's Avatar
Inmykombi (Geoff)
They aint just doubles :o

Inmykombi is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Gosford NSW Australia
Posts: 2,339
Very nice details there Stuart.

Am I correct in saying that the rings look like they are opening up a bit again ?

Keep em coming.

Geoffro.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement